GPT-5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare GPT-5 by OpenAI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 400K vs 262K, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, GPT-5 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?
GPT-5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 are both competitive models. GPT-5 costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. Context windows: 400K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
GPT-5 is made by openai while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. GPT-5 has a 400K token context window compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. On pricing, GPT-5 costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 18× input, 35× output
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 35x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
