Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 8.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.50
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
21× cheaper
Output
$0.28
8.8× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 21× input, 8.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
41%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
42%Vocabulary54%
24wSentence Length14w
0.76Hedging0.12
3.7Bold7.5
6.3Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.68
0.74Headings0.93
0.11Transitions0.12
Based on 12 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
