Llama 4 MaverickvsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick at $0.071/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.5/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.5/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 8.8x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.50
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
21× cheaper
Output
$0.28
8.8× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 21× input, 8.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
34%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 89.3x more emoji
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
49%Vocabulary52%
20wSentence Length15w
0.63Hedging0.20
2.8Bold7.0
3.8Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.89
0.65Headings0.91
0.09Transitions0.10
Based on 26 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.1-CodexNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.1 Codex MaxNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.2New provider