GPT-5vsQwen3 Coder Flash
Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper than GPT-5 at $0.3/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.
| Spec | GPT-5 | Qwen3 Coder Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.9% | 50.3% |
Our Verdict
GPT-5
Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Coder Flash costs 6.7x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-5
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input
$0.30
4.2× cheaper
Output
$1.50
6.7× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper on both: 4.2× input, 6.7× output.
Where to run it
3 hosts
Qwen3 Coder Flash1 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
41%
Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 21.6x more emoji
GPT-5
Qwen3 Coder Flash
65%Vocabulary60%
13wSentence Length85w
0.20Hedging0.56
0.2Bold5.6
4.6Lists5.8
0.00Emoji0.22
0.16Headings1.49
0.03Transitions0.15
Based on 16 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)New provider
GPT-5 vs DeepSeek V3.2New provider
GPT-5 vs DeepSeek V3.2 ExpNew provider
GPT-5 vs DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeNew provider