GPT OSS 120B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, in 26 community votes, gpt oss 120b wins 70% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Web Design: GPT OSS 120B wins 64% of votes
Image Generation: GPT OSS 120B wins 75% of votes
Our Verdict
GPT OSS 120BWinner
Llama 4 MaverickRunner-up
Pick GPT OSS 120B. In 26 blind votes, GPT OSS 120B wins 70% of the time. That's not luck.
GPT OSS 120B particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design. GPT OSS 120B is 3.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT OSS 120B
Input
$0.18
8.3× cheaper
Output
$0.80
3.1× cheaper
Llama 4 Maverick
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.50
GPT OSS 120B is cheaper on both — 8.3× input, 3.1× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
48%
GPT OSS 120B uses 15.4x more emoji
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 4 Maverick
52%Vocabulary42%
19wSentence Length24w
0.28Hedging0.76
7.4Bold3.7
1.8Lists6.3
0.15Emoji0.00
0.73Headings0.74
0.17Transitions0.11
Based on 21 + 12 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
