Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT OSS 120B

Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 131K, tested across 27 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT OSS 120B?

Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT OSS 120B are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.18/M for GPT OSS 120B. Context windows: 200K vs 131K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT OSS 120B

Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while GPT OSS 120B is from openai. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to GPT OSS 120B's 131K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.18/M for GPT OSS 120B.

Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

GPT OSS 120B is 94x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
97%

Claude Opus 4.1 uses 4.6x more sentence length

Claude Opus 4.1
GPT OSS 120B
61%Vocabulary52%
87wSentence Length19w
0.54Hedging0.28
5.1Bold7.4
6.7Lists1.8
0.38Emoji0.15
1.68Headings0.73
0.13Transitions0.17
Based on 17 + 21 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Opus 4.1GPT OSS 120B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions