GPT OSS 120BvsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 65% of 28 blind community votes against GPT OSS 120B on Rival.
| Spec | GPT OSS 120B | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Win rate | 35% | 65% |
| Input price | $0.18/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.8/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
GPT OSS 120BRunner-up
Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 28 blind votes, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 65% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick GPT OSS 120B for Reasoning. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for Web Design, Image Generation.
Clear winner
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT OSS 120B
Input
$0.18
Output
$0.80
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
1.6× cheaper
Output
$0.60
1.3× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 1.6× input, 1.3× output.
Where to run it
22 hosts, cheapest first
GPT OSS 120B19 hosts
AkashMLbf16$0.03 in$0.17 out131k100% upCoreWeavefp4$0.03 in$0.17 out131k100% upDekaLLMbf16$0.03 in$0.18 out131k99.1% upDeepInfrabf16$0.04 in$0.17 out131k99.7% upNovitafp4$0.05 in$0.25 out131k95.5% upDigitalOcean$0.06 in$0.39 out128k100% up
13 more hostsFewer hosts
Mancerfp8$0.06 in$0.50 out131k98% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.09 in$0.36 out131k99.9% upBasetenfp4$0.10 in$0.50 out128k100% upParasailfp4$0.10 in$0.75 out131k100% upSambaNova$0.14 in$0.95 out131k99% upAmazon Bedrock$0.15 in$0.60 out131k100% upGroq$0.15 in$0.60 out131k100% upNebiusfp4$0.15 in$0.60 out131k99.8% upPhala$0.15 in$0.60 out131k96.1% upSiliconFlowfp8$0.15 in$0.60 out131k95.3% upCerebrasfp16$0.35 in$0.75 out131k100% upTogetherdegraded$0.15 in$0.60 out131k97.7% upMaradegraded$0.15 in$0.75 out131k82% up
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25073 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
61%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 6.4x more emoji
GPT OSS 120B
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
52%Vocabulary56%
19wSentence Length15w
0.28Hedging0.42
7.4Bold6.1
1.8Lists4.3
0.15Emoji0.99
0.73Headings0.70
0.17Transitions0.13
Based on 21 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
GPT OSS 120B vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT OSS 20BCross-provider
GPT OSS 120B vs Claude Opus 4New provider
GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Cross-provider
GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Cross-provider
GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3.6 27BCross-provider
GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3BCross-provider