GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 28 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 65% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Web Design: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 82% of votes
Image Generation: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of votes
Reasoning: GPT OSS 120B wins 80% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
GPT OSS 120BRunner-up
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 28 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 65% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick GPT OSS 120B for Reasoning. Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for Web Design, Image Generation.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT OSS 120B
Input
$0.18
Output
$0.80
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
1.6× cheaper
Output
$0.60
1.3× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 1.6× input, 1.3× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
61%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 3.5x more emoji
GPT OSS 120B
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
52%Vocabulary56%
19wSentence Length14w
0.28Hedging0.37
7.4Bold5.7
1.8Lists4.0
0.15Emoji0.54
0.73Headings0.70
0.17Transitions0.14
Based on 21 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
