GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare GPT OSS 120B by OpenAI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 20 community votes, qwen3 30b a3b thinking 2507 wins 71% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Web Design: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 70% of votes
Image Generation: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 75% of votes
Reasoning: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Winner
GPT OSS 120BRunner-up
Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. In 20 blind votes, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 71% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design, Reasoning.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT OSS 120B
Input
$0.18
Output
$0.80
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
2.5× cheaper
Output
$0.28
2.8× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 2.5× input, 2.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
65%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 4.4x more emoji
GPT OSS 120B
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
52%Vocabulary54%
19wSentence Length14w
0.28Hedging0.12
7.4Bold7.5
1.8Lists4.2
0.15Emoji0.68
0.73Headings0.93
0.17Transitions0.12
Based on 21 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
