What is the difference between Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 is developed by Z-ai while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is developed by Qwen. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

It depends on your use case. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Z.ai: GLM 5.1 cost compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is $1.33/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 is developed by Z-ai while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is developed by Qwen. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Z.ai: GLM 5.1 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

It depends on your use case. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Z.ai: GLM 5.1 cost compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is $1.33/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Which Is Better?

Updated Apr 2026

Our Verdict

Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 15x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Input

$1.40

Output

$4.40

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Input

$0.07

20× cheaper

Output

$0.28

15× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 20× input, 15× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

53%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji

Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

54%Vocabulary54%

18wSentence Length14w

0.31Hedging0.12

3.6Bold7.5

2.6Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.68

0.43Headings0.93

0.11Transitions0.12

Based on 27 + 16 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Pony AlphaNew provider

Updated Apr 2026

Our Verdict

Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 15x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Input

$1.40

Output

$4.40

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Input

$0.07

20× cheaper

Output

$0.28

15× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 20× input, 15× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

53%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji

Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

54%Vocabulary54%

18wSentence Length14w

0.31Hedging0.12

3.6Bold7.5

2.6Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.68

0.43Headings0.93

0.11Transitions0.12

Based on 27 + 16 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Pony AlphaNew provider