Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT OSS 20BvsGrok 4.7
Updated Sep 2026

GPT OSS 20BvsGrok 4.7

GPT OSS 20B is cheaper than Grok 4.7 at $0.02/M vs $1.6/M input tokens.

GPT OSS 20B and Grok 4.7 compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecGPT OSS 20BGrok 4.7
Input price$0.02/M tokens$1.6/M tokens
Output price$0.1/M tokens$4.8/M tokens
Context window131K tokens500K tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT OSS 20B254 words
Pantry Pasta Bliss A quick, creamy, and comforting dish that turns everyday pantry staples into a satisfying meal. Ingredients (7 items) 8 oz spaghetti (or any pasta you have on hand) 2 Tbsp olive oil 3 cloves garlic, minced 1 (14.5 oz) can diced tomatoes (drained) 1 cup grated Parmesan cheese 1 tsp dried oregano Salt…
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT OSS 20B626 words
1‑Month “Starter” Plan for Health & Longevity Target: A single beginner who wants to feel stronger, sleep better, and eat smarter. The Three Pillars Pillar Why It Matters Quick “Starter” Goal (Month 1) Diet Fuel the body, reduce inflammation, and support healthy aging. 1️⃣ Reduce added sugars & refined carbs.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

GPT OSS 20B711 words
Below are the three claims in the deck that raise the most skepticism, why they’re weak, and concrete ways to make them rock‑solid. # Claim Why it’s weak (evidence / logic) How to strengthen it 1 “Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94 % accuracy.”
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GPT OSS 20B1,577 words
Below is a “code‑review” of the design you posted. I’ve broken it down into failure modes / race conditions / bottlenecks and for each one I provide a concrete fix (or set of fixes) together with the main trade‑offs you’ll pay for it.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

GPT OSS 20B755 words
1. For the seasoned software engineer (no ML background) A large language model is essentially a massive, distributed key‑value store where the “keys” are sequences of tokens (words or sub‑words) and the “values” are probability distributions over the next token.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
GPT OSS 20B
GPT OSS 20BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.7 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

GPT OSS 20B costs 48x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT OSS 20B
Input
$0.02
80× cheaper
Output
$0.10
48× cheaper
Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
Output
$4.80

GPT OSS 20B is cheaper on both: 80× input, 48× output.

Where to run it

12 hosts, cheapest first

GPT OSS 20B11 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomfp8$0.02 in·$0.09 out·131k·99.7% upAAkashMLfp4$0.02 in·$0.10 out·131k·99.3% upDDekaLLMbf16$0.03 in·$0.14 out·131k·99.6% upCCoreWeavefp4$0.03 in·$0.13 out·131k·100% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.03 in·$0.14 out·131k·99.9% upPParasailfp4$0.03 in·$0.15 out·131k·99.7% up
5 more hostsFewer hosts
NNovitafp4$0.04 in·$0.15 out·131k·99.5% upAmazon Bedrock$0.07 in·$0.15 out·131k·96% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.07 in·$0.25 out·131k·98.1% upGroq$0.07 in·$0.30 out·131k·99.7% upSSiliconFlowfp8degraded$0.04 in·$0.18 out·131k·96% up
Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·99.1% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT OSS 20B is developed by OpenAI while Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI. GPT OSS 20B has a 131K token context window vs Grok 4.7's 500K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT OSS 20B and Grok 4.7 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT OSS 20B costs $0.02/M input tokens and Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens. GPT OSS 20B is $1.58/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT OSS 20B and Grok 4.7 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT OSS 20B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT OSS 20B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT OSS 20B logoHy3 logo
GPT OSS 20B vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT OSS 20B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GPT OSS 20B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GPT OSS 20B logoGLM 5.3 logo
GPT OSS 20B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT OSS 20B logoGPT OSS 120B logo
GPT OSS 20B vs GPT OSS 120BVersion compare
GPT OSS 20B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT OSS 20B vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoo3 Mini logo
Grok 4.7 vs o3 MiniCross-provider
Grok 4.7 logoOpenAI o4-mini logo
Grok 4.7 vs OpenAI o4-miniCross-provider
Grok 4.7 logoOpenAI o4 Mini High logo
Grok 4.7 vs OpenAI o4 Mini HighCross-provider
Grok 4.7 logoOwl Alpha logo
Grok 4.7 vs Owl AlphaSame size

Model pages

GPT OSS 20B logo
GPT OSS 20B54 outputs, specs and price
Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed