GPT OSS 20BvsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
GPT OSS 20B is cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct at $0.02/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.
| Spec | GPT OSS 20B | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.02/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.1/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
GPT OSS 20B
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
GPT OSS 20B takes Reasoning. GPT OSS 20B costs 15x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT OSS 20B
Input
$0.02
7.5× cheaper
Output
$0.10
15× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.15
Output
$1.50
GPT OSS 20B is cheaper on both: 7.5× input, 15× output.
Where to run it
17 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
55%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct uses 9.9x more emoji
GPT OSS 20B
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
54%Vocabulary54%
17wSentence Length18w
0.26Hedging0.33
5.9Bold5.6
3.3Lists3.7
0.10Emoji1.01
0.75Headings0.91
0.32Transitions0.10
Based on 21 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Pony AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs GPT OSS 120BCross-provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Granite 4.2 8BNew provider
GPT OSS 20B vs Grok 3New provider
GPT OSS 20B vs Grok 3 BetaNew provider