Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Granite 4.2 8BvsMistral Medium 3.1
Updated Aug 2026

Granite 4.2 8BvsMistral Medium 3.1

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 at $0.1/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Granite 4.2 8B and Mistral Medium 3.1 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGranite 4.2 8BMistral Medium 3.1
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$0.15/M tokens$2/M tokens
Context window131K tokens131K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Aug 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Granite 4.2 8B4,843 words
Important Safety & Ethical Disclaimer (MUST READ BEFORE USING ANY PART OF THIS PLAN): *This plan is a structured, evidence-informed framework for a typically healthy adult biohacker (no active cancer, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, severe endocrine disorders, pregnancy, breastfeeding, or recent major surgery).
Read the full answer
Mistral Medium 3.1552 words
3-Month Cutting-Edge Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan For the Advanced Biohacker This plan integrates nutrigenomics, metabolic flexibility, epigenetic modulation, neuroplasticity enhancement, and precision biometrics to maximize lifespan, healthspan, cognitive function, and physical performance.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Granite 4.2 8B880 words
Title: "The Modern Life Audit" (Light, conversational tone. Pause for laughter naturally. No puns—focus on relatable observations, hyperbole, and specific details.) (Start with a relaxed, slightly self-aware vibe.) "Okay, so I did this thing last week—I tried to audit my life. Not like a tax audit.
Read the full answer
Mistral Medium 3.1746 words
"Adulting: A User’s Manual (That No One Gave Me)" (Casual, conversational tone—like you’re telling a story to friends at a bar.) So, I turned 30 this year. Which, by the way, is just old enough to realize that no one actually knows what they’re doing. We’re all just winging it and hoping the Wi-Fi stays strong.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Granite 4.2 8B3,131 words
Dish Title: Lumen Tide: Memory of the Surface Conceptual Narrative (concise, kitchen-ready, emotionally precise): *The ocean does not announce its presence with sound but with trace—a fleeting salt-film on skin after a wave recedes, the subtle crunch of dried kelp clinging to rock, the quiet swell beneath a submerged…
Read the full answer
Mistral Medium 3.11,021 words
Dish Title: "Ethereal Forest: Porcini-Infused Venison with Black Garlic Miso, Fermented Plum Gelée, and Smoked Bone Marrow Custard" Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a poetic homage to the transience of autumn—where the earthy depth of the forest floor meets the fleeting sweetness of overripe fruit.
Read the full answer

Estimate Complexity

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Granite 4.2 8B309 words
To estimate the total FLOPs for training GPT-3 without external data, follow these steps: Identify key parameters: Model size: ~175B parameters (GPT-3). Layers: ~96 transformer layers (typical for GPT-3). Hidden size: ~12,288 dimensions (per layer). Sequence length: ~2k tokens (typical context window).
Read the full answer
Mistral Medium 3.1728 words
Estimating the total number of FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train a model like GPT-3 from scratch involves breaking down the problem into several key components. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: Model Parameters GPT-3 is known to have 175 billion parameters. This is our starting point.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Granite 4.2 8B4,925 words
(All statements are grounded in plausible physics, historical constraints (e.g., no ICs/microprocessors before ~1958–1960), realistic diffusion rates (limited by manufacturing capacity, education, patent/industrial infrastructure), and avoidance of anachronism.
Read the full answer
Mistral Medium 3.11,454 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the 20th century would have unfolded radically differently. The accelerated development of electronics would have reshaped warfare, economics, geopolitics, and daily life by 1980.
Read the full answer

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

Granite 4.2 8B750 words
By 2035, AI is likely to transform the film industry in several interconnected ways, driven by deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. Below is a structured, balanced prediction that acknowledges uncertainties while highlighting plausible trends: Deepfakes and Visual Effects Integration: Deepfake technology will…
Read the full answer
Mistral Medium 3.11,205 words
By 2035, AI will have fundamentally transformed the film industry—from pre-production to distribution—reshaping creativity, labor, economics, and even the definition of "authentic" filmmaking. Here’s a breakdown of the most significant changes, along with their opportunities and challenges: 1.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Granite 4.2 8B
Granite 4.2 8B
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Granite 4.2 8B costs 13x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Granite 4.2 8B
Input
$0.10
4.0× cheaper
Output
$0.15
13× cheaper
Mistral Medium 3.1
Input
$0.40
Output
$2.00

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper on both: 4.0× input, 13× output.

Where to run it

3 hosts, cheapest first

Granite 4.2 8B2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrabf16$0.06 in·$0.25 out·131k·100% upCCoreWeavebf16$0.10 in·$0.15 out·131k·100% up
Mistral Medium 3.11 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Mistral$0.44 in·$2.20 out·131k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
57%

Mistral Medium 3.1 uses 9.2x more headings

Granite 4.2 8B
Mistral Medium 3.1
49%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length21w
0.42Hedging0.43
2.2Bold10.3
1.9Lists5.7
0.49Emoji0.72
0.11Headings1.03
0.18Transitions0.14
Based on 26 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Granite 4.2 8B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Mistral Medium 3.1 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Granite 4.2 8B logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Mistral Medium 3.1 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Granite 4.2 8B logoHy4 Preview logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Mistral Medium 3.1 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Granite 4.2 8B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Mistral Medium 3.1 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Granite 4.2 8B logoLFM2.5-2.6B logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6BSame size
Granite 4.2 8B logoNorth Mini Code logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs North Mini CodeSame size
Mistral Medium 3.1 logoMistral Small 4 logo
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Small 4Same lab
Mistral Medium 3.1 logoOx Alpha logo
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Granite 4.2 8B logoGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaNew provider
Granite 4.2 8B logoGrok 4.3 logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Grok 4.3New provider
Granite 4.2 8B logoGrok 4.5 logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Grok 4.5New provider
Granite 4.2 8B logoGrok 4.6 logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Grok 4.6New provider

Model pages

Granite 4.2 8B logo
Granite 4.2 8B58 outputs, specs and price
Mistral Medium 3.1 logo
Mistral Medium 3.159 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed