Granite 4.2 8BvsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Granite 4.2 8B at $0.071/M vs $0.1/M input tokens.
| Spec | Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.15/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Granite 4.2 8BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Granite 4.2 8B
Input
$0.10
Output
$0.15
1.9× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
1.4× cheaper
Output
$0.28
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins input (1.4× cheaper)·Granite 4.2 8B wins output (1.9× cheaper)
Where to run it
3 hosts, cheapest first
Granite 4.2 8B2 hosts
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
61%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 8.1x more headings
Granite 4.2 8B
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
49%Vocabulary52%
18wSentence Length15w
0.42Hedging0.20
2.2Bold7.0
1.9Lists4.2
0.49Emoji0.89
0.11Headings0.91
0.18Transitions0.10
Based on 26 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
Granite 4.2 8B vs Mistral NemoNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Mistral Small 4New provider
Granite 4.2 8B vs Mistral Small CreativeNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Muse Spark 1.1New provider