Grok 3 Beta vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Grok 3 Beta by xAI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Grok 3 Beta
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 14x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Grok 3 Beta
Input
$2.00
Output
$4.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
28× cheaper
Output
$0.28
14× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 28× input, 14× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
Grok 3 Beta
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
48%Vocabulary54%
19wSentence Length14w
0.67Hedging0.12
3.1Bold7.5
5.5Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.68
0.52Headings0.93
0.28Transitions0.12
Based on 23 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
