Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper than Grok 3 Mini Beta at $0/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.1 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $0.8/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $4.00 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.
Grok 3 Mini Beta is developed by xAI while Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by inclusionAI. Grok 3 Mini Beta has a 131K token context window vs Ling 3.1 Flash's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 3 Mini Beta and Ling 3.1 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Grok 3 Mini Beta costs $0.4/M input tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 3 Mini Beta and Ling 3.1 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.