Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than Grok 3 Mini Beta at $0.25/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Llama 4 Scout has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.8/M tokens | $0.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 10.0M tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | 17B active (109B total) |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| LiveCodeBench | 80.4% | 32.8% |
| At 10M a month | $4.00 | $2.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Grok 3 Mini Beta is developed by xAI while Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta AI. Grok 3 Mini Beta has a 131K token context window vs Llama 4 Scout's 10.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 3 Mini Beta and Llama 4 Scout each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Grok 3 Mini Beta costs $0.4/M input tokens and Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens. Llama 4 Scout is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 3 Mini Beta and Llama 4 Scout across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.