Grok 3 Thinking vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Compare Grok 3 Thinking by xAI against Qwen3 235B A22B by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 33K, tested across 13 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Grok 3 Thinking or Qwen3 235B A22B?

Grok 3 Thinking and Qwen3 235B A22B are both competitive models. Context windows: 128K vs 33K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Grok 3 Thinking and Qwen3 235B A22B

Grok 3 Thinking is made by xai while Qwen3 235B A22B is from qwen. Grok 3 Thinking has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's 33K.

Our Verdict
Grok 3 Thinking
Grok 3 Thinking
Qwen3 235B A22B
Qwen3 235B A22B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
89%

Grok 3 Thinking uses 111.1x more hedging

Grok 3 Thinking
Qwen3 235B A22B
46%Vocabulary68%
19wSentence Length9w
1.11Hedging0.00
3.3Bold5.8
2.6Lists3.7
0.00Emoji0.74
0.64Headings0.00
0.25Transitions0.12
Based on 6 + 2 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Grok 3 ThinkingQwen3 235B A22B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions