Grok 3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Grok 3 by xAI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Grok 3 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?
Grok 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 are both competitive models. Context windows: 128K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Grok 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Grok 3 is made by xai while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. Grok 3 has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K.
API pricing
Per 1M tokens
Grok 3
Input
—
Output
—
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
Output
$0.28
Our Verdict
Grok 3
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
34%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 17.2x more emoji
Grok 3
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
49%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length14w
0.94Hedging0.12
2.5Bold7.5
3.0Lists4.2
0.04Emoji0.68
0.65Headings0.93
0.08Transitions0.12
Based on 17 + 16 text responses
FAQ
