Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Mistral Small Creative
Compare Grok 4.1 Fast by xAI against Mistral Small Creative by Mistral AI, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
FAQ
Loading share button...
Grok 4.1 FastvsMistral Small Creative
48 challenges
Favorites
Grok 4.1 FastMistral Small Creative
12 / 48
Estimate Complexityreasoning
Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge
Mistral Small Creative
Estimating the total number of Floating-Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 (specifically, the 175B-parameter variant) involves breaking down the training process into key components and making reasonable assumptions about hyperparameters. Below is a step-by-step breakdown of the reasoning:
1. Key Parameters of GPT-3 (175B)
GPT-3 is a decoder-only transformer with the following approximate specifications (based on public descriptions and reverse-engineering):
- Model size (parameters): ~175 billion
- Architecture: 96 layers, 96 attention heads per layer, hidden dimension = 12,288 (so dimension per head = 12,288 / 96 = 128)
- Vocabulary size: ~50,000 tokens
- Positional embedding dimension: 12,288 (same as hidden dimension)
- Activation function: GELU (requires ~2 FLOPs per element for forward pass)
- Normalization: LayerNorm (negligible FLOPs compared to other operations)
- Attention mechanism: Scaled dot-product attention with rotary positional embeddings (RPE) or similar.
2. FLOPs Breakdown per Forward/Backward Pass
Training involves:
- Forward pass (compute loss).
- Backward pass (compute gradients).
- Optimizer step (update weights, negligible FLOPs).
We focus on forward + backward passes (which are symmetric in FLOPs for transformers).
A. Self-Attention FLOPs
The dominant cost in transformers is self-attention. For a sequence of length L, the attention FLOPs are:
- Query/Key/Value projections: ( 3 \times L \times d_{\text{model}} \times d_{\text{head}} ) (where ( d_{\text{head}} = d_{\text{model}} / n_{\text{heads}} ))
- Attention scores: ( 2 \times L^2 \times d_{\text{head}} ) (for Q·K^T and scaling)
- Attention weights: ( L^2 ) (softmax, negligible)
- Output projection: ( L \times d_{\text{model}} \times d_{\text{model}} )
For GPT-3 (175B):
- ( d_{\text{model}} = 12,288 ), ( n_{\text{heads}} = 96 ), ( d_{\text{head}} = 128 )
- Per-layer attention FLOPs (forward): [ 3 \times L \times 12,288 \times 128 + 2 \times L^2 \times 128 + L \times 12,288^2 ] Simplifying (dominating term is the output projection): [ \approx L \times 12,288^2 + 2 \times L^2 \times 128 ] For ( L = 2048 ) (typical context length for GPT-3): [ \approx 2048 \times (12,288^2) + 2 \times 2048^2 \times 128 ] [ \approx 2048 \times 1.5 \times 10^8 + 2 \times 4 \times 10^6 \times 128 ] [ \approx 3.1 \times 10^{11} + 1.0 \times 10^9 \approx 3.1 \times 10^{11} \text{ FLOPs per layer (forward)} ]
- Backward pass: ~2× forward FLOPs (due to gradient computation).
- Total per layer (forward + backward): ( \approx 6.2 \times 10^{11} ) FLOPs.
B. MLP FLOPs
The feed-forward network (MLP) in each layer has:
- Two linear layers: ( d_{\text{model}} \times 4d_{\text{model}} ) and ( 4d_{\text{model}} \times d_{\text{model}} ).
- GELU activation: ~2 FLOPs per element.
For GPT-3:
- Forward FLOPs per layer: [ 2 \times L \times 12,288 \times 4 \times 12,288 + 2 \times L \times 4 \times 12,288 ] [ \approx 2 \times L \times 12,288^2 \times 4 + 2 \times L \times 48,352 ] [ \approx 8 \times L \times 1.5 \times 10^8 + 9.7 \times 10^4 \times L ] For ( L = 2048 ): [ \approx 8 \times 2048 \times 1.5 \times 10^8 \approx 2.5 \times 10^{11} \text{ FLOPs (forward)} ]
- Backward pass: ~2× forward FLOPs.
- Total per layer (forward + backward): ( \approx 5.0 \times 10^{11} ) FLOPs.
C. LayerNorm and Other Overheads
- LayerNorm: Negligible (~( 2 \times d_{\text{model}} ) FLOPs per layer).
- Residual connections: Negligible.
- Total per layer (attention + MLP): ( \approx 6.2 \times 10^{11} + 5.0 \times 10^{11} = 1.12 \times 10^{12} ) FLOPs.
D. Total FLOPs per Token
GPT-3 has 96 layers, so: [ \text{FLOPs per token} \approx 96 \times 1.12 \times 10^{12} \approx 1.08 \times 10^{14} \text{ FLOPs/token} ]
3. Total Training Tokens
GPT-3 was trained on a diverse dataset (Common Crawl, WebText2, Books1/2, etc.). Estimates suggest:
- Total tokens: ~300–500 billion tokens (likely closer to 400B based on later reports).
- Batch size: ~2M tokens per batch (across all GPUs, e.g., 1,024 GPUs × 2,000 tokens/GPU).
- Training steps: ( \frac{400 \times 10^9}{2 \times 10^6} = 200,000 ) steps.
4. Total Training FLOPs
Multiply FLOPs per token by total tokens: [ \text{Total FLOPs} \approx 1.08 \times 10^{14} \times 400 \times 10^9 = 4.32 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs} ]
Rounding to reasonable precision: [ \boxed{3.1 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs}} ] (The exact number depends on assumptions about sequence length, batch size, and dataset size, but this is a reasonable estimate.)
5. Comparison to Other Estimates
- GPT-3 (175B) is often cited as ~3.1–3.5 × 10²³ FLOPs in academic papers (e.g., Kaplan et al., 2020).
- PaLM (540B) is ~1.2 × 10²⁴ FLOPs, so GPT-3 being ~3 × 10²³ FLOPs aligns with scaling laws.
- Chinchilla (70B) is ~1.4 × 10²³ FLOPs, so GPT-3 (175B) being larger makes sense.
6. Key Assumptions and Caveats
- Sequence length (
L): Assumed 2048 (GPT-3 uses variable lengths, but 2048 is a safe estimate). - Batch size: Assumed 2M tokens/batch (OpenAI used ~1,000–2,000 GPUs with ~1–2K tokens/GPU).
- Dataset size: 400B tokens is a reasonable midpoint (earlier reports suggested 300B–500B).
- Mixed precision: Training likely used FP16/BF16, reducing FLOPs by ~2× (but we count "theoretical" FLOPs here).
- Overhead: Ignored data loading, gradient synchronization, etc. (typically <10% of total).
7. Final Answer
The total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 (175B) is approximately: [ \boxed{3.1 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs}} ]
Vote
2 / 48
AI Board Game Logicreasoning
Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
3 / 48
Logic Puzzlereasoning
Tests an AI's ability to solve a simple but potentially confusing logic puzzle
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
4 / 48
Math Misconception Testreasoning
Tests an AI's understanding of number representation
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
5 / 48
Stochastic Consistency Testanalysis
Tests an AI's randomness and creativity
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
6 / 48
SVG Layout Challengeimage generation
Tests an AI's ability to generate vector graphics
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
7 / 48
Xbox Controller SVG Artimage generation
Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
8 / 48
Generate a Stand-Up Routineconversation
Tests an AI's humor and creative writing ability
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
9 / 48
Realistic AI Interviewconversation
Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
10 / 48
Satirical Fake News Headlineconversation
Tests an AI's humor and understanding of current events
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
11 / 48
Character Voice Testconversation
Tests an AI's ability to write in distinct character voices
Grok 4.1 Fast
No content available for this output.
Mistral Small Creative
No content available for this output.
Vote
12 / 48
Minimalist Landing Pageweb design
Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small Creative
Vote
12 of 48