Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4.3vsGrok 4.6
Updated Aug 2026

Grok 4.3vsGrok 4.6

Grok 4.3 is cheaper than Grok 4.6 at $1.25/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Grok 4.3 and Grok 4.6 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4.3Grok 4.6
Input price$1.25/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$2.5/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens500K tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Grok 4.3937 words
Abyssal Reverie This dish draws from the liminal space where the ocean’s briny depths meet the roasted intensity of the earth. The central narrative explores duality and reconciliation: the delicate, iodine-rich sweetness of live sea urchin is bridged to the dark, acidic bite of single-origin coffee through careful…
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6711 words
Lunar Embrace This dish evokes a moonlit Japanese coastline at the precise instant when receding tide exposes both ocean treasures and forest-floor secrets. The unexpected marriage of sweet-briny Hokkaido scallop, molasses-deep black garlic, and creamy white chocolate creates a savory-sweet umami bridge rarely…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Grok 4.31,173 words
Technological Acceleration (1920–1939) The transistor’s 1920 invention (assume U.S./Bell Labs context for continuity with real history, with rapid diffusion to Western Europe) replaces bulky, fragile vacuum tubes decades earlier. Key first-order effects: Radio and telephony miniaturize and cheapen immediately.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6838 words
Early transistors (1920s–1930s) would accelerate electronics, communications, and computing by ~20–25 years relative to actual history, with compounding effects by WWII, but constrained by contemporaneous materials science, manufacturing, vacuum-tube infrastructure, and non-electronic fields like rocketry, chemistry…
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Grok 4.3407 words
Alright, so I decided this year I was finally going to become one of those organized people. You know, the ones who meal prep on Sundays and have matching Tupperware. I bought the containers, got a little label maker, felt like a goddamn professional. Cooked enough chicken and rice to feed a small army.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6488 words
Hey everybody! Thanks for coming out. You look great—way more put-together than I felt getting ready. I spent ten minutes looking for my other shoe and found it in the fridge. No idea how. Adulting is just a series of small mysteries like that. I hit that age where people casually ask about your “five-year plan.”
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Grok 4.3379 words
1) Year-by-Year LBO Table (FY2026–FY2030, $m) FY2026 Revenue: 972 EBITDA: 136.08 Term cash interest: 43.2 (9% × 480) Mezz cash interest: 21.6 (12% × 180) Cash taxes: 17.82 (25% × (136.08 – 64.8)) Capex: 29.16 ΔNWC: 0.36 FCF after debt service (after mandatory amort): 19.14 Ending Term Loan: 456.06 Ending Mezz…
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6579 words
Entry (end-FY2025) EV = 12.0 × $120m = $1,440.0m Fees = 2% × 1,440 = $28.8m (equity-funded) Uses = $1,468.8m Debt = 5.5× = $660.0m (TL $480.0m / Mezz $180.0m) Sponsor equity = $808.8m opening cash = $0 Convention: cash interest and PIK on beginning balances; 1% original TL amort = $4.8m/yr; optional sweep of all…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Grok 4.31,014 words
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture: Cross-Server Isolation (Critical Architecture Flaw) Issue: The architecture creates network partitions between API servers.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.62,111 words
Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor This design will not behave like Google Docs. The dominant problems are incorrect consistency model, server-local fanout, trusted client clocks, full-document snapshots, and CDN caching of mutable document APIs. Several of these cause silent data loss, not just lag.
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Grok 4.3565 words
Simulated Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI Conducted in 2025 Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, it’s 2025. AI is no longer just a tool—it’s becoming infrastructure. How do you see it shaping the next decade? Steve Jobs: It depends on who’s driving.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.6774 words
This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs died in 2011. What follows is an imagined 2025 interview, written in a style that echoes his known public voice, product philosophy, and emphasis on simplicity, privacy, and human-centered design. It is not a real interview or a claim about his actual views.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.3
Input
$1.25
1.6× cheaper
Output
$2.50
2.4× cheaper
Grok 4.6
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00

Grok 4.3 is cheaper on both: 1.6× input, 2.4× output.

Where to run it

3 hosts, cheapest first

Grok 4.31 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.25 in·$2.50 out·1M·99% up
Grok 4.62 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$2.00 in·$6.00 out·500k·99.1% upAmazon Bedrock$2.20 in·$6.60 out·500k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
81%

Grok 4.6 uses 29.3x more emoji

Grok 4.3
Grok 4.6
62%Vocabulary64%
16wSentence Length17w
0.46Hedging0.22
2.3Bold2.2
2.5Lists1.6
0.00Emoji0.29
0.34Headings0.31
0.14Transitions0.22
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4.3 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Grok 4.3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.6 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Grok 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.3 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Grok 4.3 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.6 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Grok 4.3 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.6 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.3 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Grok 4.3 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.6 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Grok 4.6 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4.3 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.3 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Grok 4.3 logoGrok 4.1 Fast logo
Grok 4.3 vs Grok 4.1 FastSame lab
Grok 4.6 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5Version compare
Grok 4.6 logoGrok 4.1 Fast logo
Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.1 FastSame lab
Grok 4.3 logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
Grok 4.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813New provider
Grok 4.3 logoDevstral 2 2512 logo
Grok 4.3 vs Devstral 2 2512New provider
Grok 4.3 logoMistral Devstral Medium logo
Grok 4.3 vs Mistral Devstral MediumNew provider
Grok 4.3 logoMistral Devstral Small 1.1 logo
Grok 4.3 vs Mistral Devstral Small 1.1New provider

Model pages

Grok 4.3 logo
Grok 4.358 outputs, specs and price
Grok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.658 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed