Grok 4.3vsQwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper than Grok 4.3 at $0.2/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.
| Spec | Grok 4.3 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.5/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2026 | Feb 2026 |
Our Verdict
Grok 4.3
Qwen3 Coder NextRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.3 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Grok 4.3
Input
$1.25
Output
$2.50
Qwen3 Coder Next
Input
$0.20
6.3× cheaper
Output
$1.50
1.7× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on both: 6.3× input, 1.7× output.
Where to run it
5 hosts, cheapest first
Grok 4.31 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
30%
Qwen3 Coder Next uses 83.8x more emoji
Grok 4.3
Qwen3 Coder Next
62%Vocabulary58%
16wSentence Length19w
0.46Hedging0.27
2.3Bold6.4
2.5Lists4.4
0.00Emoji0.84
0.34Headings0.98
0.14Transitions0.06
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.7 MaxCross-provider
Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.7 PlusCross-provider
Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BCross-provider
Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.8 27BCross-provider