Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4.7vsKimi K2 0905
Updated Sep 2026

Grok 4.7vsKimi K2 0905

Kimi K2 0905 is cheaper than Grok 4.7 at $0.6/M vs $1.6/M input tokens.

Grok 4.7 and Kimi K2 0905 compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4.7Kimi K2 0905
Input price$1.6/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Output price$4.8/M tokens$2.5/M tokens
Context window500K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Sep 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 0905500 words
Comprehensive Analysis of Collaborative Document Editor Architecture Real-time Synchronization Issues Race Condition: WebSocket Broadcast Gaps Problem: Changes only broadcast to clients connected to the same server. Clients on other servers must wait up to 2 seconds for polling.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 0905884 words
Senior backend engineer Think of the model as a 200-layer, purely functional, eventually-consistent key/value store whose keys are every token prefix it has ever seen and whose values are probability vectors over the next token. At “compile time” (pre-training) it sees ~10²¹ bytes of text.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 0905192 words
Dish Name: “Midnight Magic Peanut-Butter Clouds” Pantry 7: Peanut butter – ½ cup Granulated sugar – ½ cup 1 large egg Vanilla extract – ½ tsp Baking soda – ¼ tsp Salt – 1 pinch Cocoa powder – 1 Tbsp (or 1 extra tsp sugar if you don’t want chocolate) Time: 5 min prep + 8 min bake = 13 minutes total Yield: 8–10 bite-size…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 0905322 words
The three weakest claims, in order of how quickly an investor’s BS-detector will go off, are: “94 % accuracy … works with any language, any device.” “TAM: $180 B.” “Partnership discussions with Apple and Samsung.”
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer
Kimi K2 0905759 words
1-MONTH “BETTER-HEALTH & LONGEVITY” STARTER PLAN (Print this one-pager, stick it on the fridge, tick the boxes daily) FOCUS AREA 1 – EAT A LITTLE BETTER Goal: Add 3 longevity foods, subtract 3 ultra-processed foods, never go hungry.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
Kimi K2 0905
Kimi K2 0905

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
Output
$4.80
Kimi K2 0905
Input
$0.60
2.7× cheaper
Output
$2.50
1.9× cheaper

Kimi K2 0905 is cheaper on both: 2.7× input, 1.9× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·99.1% up
Kimi K2 09051 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovitafp8$0.60 in·$2.50 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI while Kimi K2 0905 is developed by Moonshot AI. Grok 4.7 has a 500K token context window vs Kimi K2 0905's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.7 and Kimi K2 0905 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens and Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.6/M input tokens. Kimi K2 0905 is $1.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.7 and Kimi K2 0905 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4.7 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K2 0905 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Kimi K2 0905 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoHy3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Kimi K2 0905 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K2 0905 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Kimi K2 0905 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Kimi K2 0905 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Kimi K2 0905 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Kimi K2 0905 logoKimi K3 logo
Kimi K2 0905 vs Kimi K3Same lab
Kimi K2 0905 logoKimi K2.7 Code logo
Kimi K2 0905 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeSame lab
Grok 4.7 logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview logo
Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025New provider
Grok 4.7 logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logo
Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)New provider
Grok 4.7 logoGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental logo
Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalNew provider

Model pages

Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Kimi K2 0905 logo
Kimi K2 090559 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed