Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4.7vsKimi K2.7 Code
Updated Sep 2026

Grok 4.7vsKimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper than Grok 4.7 at $0.95/M vs $1.6/M input tokens.

Grok 4.7 and Kimi K2.7 Code compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4.7Kimi K2.7 Code
Input price$1.6/M tokens$0.95/M tokens
Output price$4.8/M tokens$4/M tokens
Context window500K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Jun 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer
Kimi K2.7 Code218 words
Sunshine Chickpea & Rice Pilaf A cozy, one-pot pantry meal that’s earthy, lightly spiced, and satisfying. Ingredients (7 pantry staples) 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 can (14.5 oz) diced tomatoes, with juices 1 cup long-grain white rice 1 small yellow onion, diced 2 cloves garlic, minced 2 tbsp olive…
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer
Kimi K2.7 Code880 words
For the experienced software engineer You can think of a large language model as a distributed compression engine that has been forced to become a pattern-matching oracle. During training, it is shown trillions of tokens of text and is optimized for one task: predict the next token given all previous tokens.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer
Kimi K2.7 Code596 words
30-Day Health & Longevity Starter Plan Core idea: Don’t overhaul everything at once. Build 3 small, repeatable habits in Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep/Stress Recovery. Aim for “better most days,” not perfect. Nutrition: Eat Mostly Whole Foods, Protein & Plants This week: Add before you subtract.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer
Kimi K2.7 Code511 words
Below is a structured review of the proposed architecture. Issues are grouped by domain, and each includes a problem, impact, and a specific solution with trade-offs.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer
Kimi K2.7 Code817 words
The three weakest claims are the technical “read your mind before you think it” vision, the “94% accuracy, any language, any device” solution claim, and the $180B top-down TAM.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
Output
$4.80
Kimi K2.7 Code
Input
$0.95
1.7× cheaper
Output
$4.00
1.2× cheaper

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper on both: 1.7× input, 1.2× output.

Where to run it

15 hosts, cheapest first

Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·99.1% up
Kimi K2.7 Code14 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.68 in·$3.40 out·262k—IInceptronint4$0.71 in·$3.30 out·262k·99.8% upCCoreWeaveint4$0.71 in·$3.50 out·262k·99.9% upSStreamLake$0.71 in·$3.00 out·256k·99.8% upVVeniceint4$0.75 in·$3.50 out·256k·95.9% upMModelRunfp4$0.85 in·$3.75 out·262k·100% up
8 more hostsFewer hosts
SSiliconFlowfp8$0.86 in·$3.80 out·262k·99.9% upNNovitaint4$0.91 in·$3.84 out·262k·100% upAlibaba Cloudfp8$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·99.9% upBBasetenfp4$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·99.9% upCloudflare Workers AI$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·100% upFFireworks$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·95.6% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·100% upMoonshot AIint4$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI while Kimi K2.7 Code is developed by Moonshot AI. Grok 4.7 has a 500K token context window vs Kimi K2.7 Code's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.7 and Kimi K2.7 Code each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens and Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95/M input tokens. Kimi K2.7 Code is $0.65/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.7 and Kimi K2.7 Code across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4.7 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K2.7 Code logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoHy3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Kimi K2.7 Code logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K2.7 Code logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Kimi K2.7 Code logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Kimi K2.7 Code logoKimi K3 logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K3Same lab
Kimi K2.7 Code logoKimi K2.5 logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2.5Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoInkling logo
Grok 4.7 vs InklingNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoINTELLECT-3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs INTELLECT-3Same size
Grok 4.7 logoKimi K2 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Kimi K2Cross-provider
Grok 4.7 logoKimi K2 0905 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Kimi K2 0905Cross-provider

Model pages

Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Kimi K2.7 Code logo
Kimi K2.7 Code58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed