Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4.7vsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Updated Sep 2026

Grok 4.7vsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than Grok 4.7 at $0.2/M vs $1.6/M input tokens.

Grok 4.7 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4.7Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input price$1.6/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Output price$4.8/M tokens$0.8/M tokens
Context window500K tokens131K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Jul 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25071,424 words
Your real-time collaborative document editor architecture is well-structured for a scalable, low-latency system — but it contains several critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks that could degrade user experience or cause data loss.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507207 words
Dish Name: Sunny Sauté Skillet Ingredients (7 pantry staples): Olive oil Garlic (fresh, minced) Dried spaghetti (or any short pasta) Canned crushed tomatoes Dried oregano Salt & black pepper Grated Parmesan cheese Instructions: Prep (5 mins): Bring a pot of salted water to a boil.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507729 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with detailed explanations of why they’re problematic and concrete suggestions for strengthening them: 1. Weak Claim: "We use advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507495 words
Here’s a simple, realistic 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars of health and longevity: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. Each area includes beginner-friendly, actionable steps that build sustainable habits without overwhelming beginners. Month-Long Health & Longevity Plan (3 Key Areas) 1.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507969 words
1. To the experienced software engineer (distributed systems, APIs, skeptical of "next word" claims): You’re right to be skeptical—on the surface, “predict the next word” does sound like a glorified autocomplete.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.7 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 6.0x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
Output
$4.80
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
8.0× cheaper
Output
$0.80
6.0× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both: 8.0× input, 6.0× output.

Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·98.9% up
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25075 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLake$0.05 in·$0.19 out·128k·98.5% upDDekaLLM$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·98.2% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·94.9% upNNebiusfp8$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·90.6% upAlibaba Cloud$0.13 in·$0.52 out·131k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI while Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is developed by Qwen. Grok 4.7 has a 500K token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.7 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.2/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is $1.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.7 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4.7 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoHy3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4 Fast (free) logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4 Fast (free)Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.1 Fast logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.1 FastSame lab
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGrok 4.20 Beta logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Grok 4.20 BetaCross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaCross-provider

Model pages

Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 250759 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed