Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4.7vsQwen3.5 9B
Updated Sep 2026

Grok 4.7vsQwen3.5 9B

Qwen3.5 9B is cheaper than Grok 4.7 at $0.1/M vs $1.6/M input tokens.

Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.5 9B compared across 9 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4.7Qwen3.5 9B
Input price$1.6/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$4.8/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Context window500K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Mar 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 9 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 9B1,263 words
This architecture contains several significant architectural flaws that would result in data loss, user frustration, and severe scaling limitations. While it mimics a general backend structure, it lacks the specific patterns required for collaborative editing.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 9B249 words
Recipe: The Golden Peanut Butter Noodles Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 10 minutes Total Time: 15 minutes Ingredients (Exactly 7 Common Pantry Items) Dry Spaghetti (or any long pasta) Peanut Butter (creamy, no honey) Soy Sauce Honey Sesame Oil Garlic Powder Water (for boiling) (Note: Add a pinch of Salt and optional…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 9B627 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed to build healthy habits without overwhelming you. The philosophy here is consistency over intensity. You are aiming to build a lifestyle, not a temporary fix. The Three Pillars Nutrition: Fueling your body for repair. Movement: Keeping your body strong and agile.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 9B781 words
Here are the 3 weakest claims in the "MindMeld AI" pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they are dangerous and how to fix them. The Scientific Feasibility Claim (Slides 1 & 3) The Weak Claim: "Predict what you want to type before you think it" and "94% accuracy."
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 9B949 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Imagine this system not as a thinking brain, but as a massive, stateless API that has been trained to predict the next operation in a sequence.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
Qwen3.5 9B
Qwen3.5 9BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.7 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen3.5 9B costs 32x less per token.

Slight edge
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
Output
$4.80
Qwen3.5 9B
Input
$0.10
16× cheaper
Output
$0.15
32× cheaper

Qwen3.5 9B is cheaper on both: 16× input, 32× output.

Where to run it

7 hosts, cheapest first

Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·98.9% up
Qwen3.5 9B6 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomfp4$0.08 in·$0.13 out·262k·100% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.10 in·$0.15 out·262k·99.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.10 in·$0.15 out·262k·99.2% upVVenicefp8$0.10 in·$0.15 out·256k·99.5% upPParasailbf16$0.10 in·$0.25 out·262k·99.8% upTTogether$0.17 in·$0.25 out·262k·98.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI while Qwen3.5 9B is developed by Qwen. Grok 4.7 has a 500K token context window vs Qwen3.5 9B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 9 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.5 9B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 9 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 9B costs $0.1/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 9B is $1.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.5 9B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4.7 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 9B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.5 9B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoHy3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 9B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 9B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 9B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.5 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 9B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.5 9B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Qwen3.5 9B logoQwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Qwen3.5 9B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BVersion compare
Qwen3.5 9B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 9B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5.6 Sol logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5.6 SolNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5.6 Terra logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5.6 TerraSame size
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 AstraNew provider
Qwen3.5 9B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Qwen3.5 9B vs GPT-6 Astra ProNew provider

Model pages

Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.5 9B logo
Qwen3.5 9B55 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed