Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4.7vsQwen3.5 Flash
Updated Sep 2026

Grok 4.7vsQwen3.5 Flash

Qwen3.5 Flash is cheaper than Grok 4.7 at $0.1/M vs $1.6/M input tokens.

Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.5 Flash compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4.7Qwen3.5 Flash
Input price$1.6/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$4.8/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Context window500K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Flash270 words
🍜 Golden Lightning Noodles Description: A quick, creamy, and savory-sweet noodle dish that packs a punch of flavor using staples you likely already have. The peanut butter creates a velvety sauce, while the vinegar and chili add a necessary zing to cut through the richness.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Flash614 words
The 30-Day Longevity Launchpad Goal: Build sustainable habits that reduce inflammation, improve energy, and extend healthspan. Mindset: Consistency beats intensity. Do not aim for perfection; aim for showing up. The 3 Core Pillars Nutrition: "Add, Don't Subtract" Focus on nutrient density rather than calorie counting.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Flash1,249 words
This architecture is a common "MVP" design, but it contains several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a true real-time collaborative editor (like Google Docs) under load. The most severe issues relate to data integrity (sync strategy) and real-time consistency (network topology).
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Flash809 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they undermine investor confidence and how to fix them. The Technical Claim: "94% accuracy...
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Flash1,022 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer To you, an LLM isn't magic; it's a massive, stateful service running on a distributed cluster. Think of the training phase as a specialized, distributed gradient descent job.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
Qwen3.5 Flash
Qwen3.5 FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.7 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, major provider backing.

Qwen3.5 Flash costs 12x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
Output
$4.80
Qwen3.5 Flash
Input
$0.10
16× cheaper
Output
$0.40
12× cheaper

Qwen3.5 Flash is cheaper on both: 16× input, 12× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·98.9% up
Qwen3.5 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.07 in·$0.26 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI while Qwen3.5 Flash is developed by Qwen. Grok 4.7 has a 500K token context window vs Qwen3.5 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.5 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Flash costs $0.1/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 Flash is $1.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.5 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4.7 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.5 Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoHy3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Flash logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.5 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Flash logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.5 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Qwen3.5 Flash logoQwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BVersion compare
Qwen3.5 Flash logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5New provider
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5 Codex logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5 CodexNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5 Mini logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5 MiniNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5 Nano logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5 NanoNew provider

Model pages

Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.5 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 Flash53 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed