Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4.7vsQwen3.8 27B
Updated Sep 2026

Grok 4.7vsQwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper than Grok 4.7 at $0.4/M vs $1.6/M input tokens.

Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 27B compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4.7Qwen3.8 27B
Input price$1.6/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$4.8/M tokens$3/M tokens
Context window500K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedSep 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B116 words
Pantry Firecracker Black Beans A quick, savory, one-pan dish made with only 7 common pantry ingredients. Estimated time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 10 minutes Total: about 15 minutes Ingredients 1 can black beans, drained 2 tablespoons olive oil 1 teaspoon ground cumin 1/2 teaspoon chili powder 1/2 teaspoon garlic powder…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B4,268 words
Below is a comprehensive issue register based on the architecture you described. I’m assuming: “change event” can be a small edit, possibly per keystroke or per paragraph. Documents are stored as HTML blobs. Each API server owns only its own WebSocket clients.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B936 words
Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on 3 key areas: movement, food, and sleep/stress. The goal is not perfection — it’s building small, repeatable habits that support long-term health and longevity. Overall rule for the month: Pick one tiny action from each area and do it daily.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B2,587 words
The 3 weakest claims are the ones that carry the investment thesis: product feasibility, market size, and proof of demand/valuation. Weakest claim: “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it” + “94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device.”
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B1,144 words
For an experienced software engineer Think of a large language model as a stateless inference service plus an enormous offline training pipeline. At inference time, the model takes a prompt, converts it into tokens, and produces a probability distribution over the next token.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.7 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Slight edge
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
Output
$4.80
Qwen3.8 27B
Input
$0.40
4.0× cheaper
Output
$3.00
1.6× cheaper

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on both: 4.0× input, 1.6× output.

Where to run it

17 hosts, cheapest first

Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·98.9% up
Qwen3.8 27B16 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomfp4$0.10 in·$1.80 out·262k·99% upDDekaLLM$0.10 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.7% upWWafer$0.11 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.9% upRRekafp8$0.12 in·$2.48 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.15 in·$1.88 out·262k·97% upPPhala$0.20 in·$2.08 out·262k·98% up
10 more hostsFewer hosts
MMancerfp8$0.20 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.8% upCChutesfp8$0.24 in·$2.20 out·262k·99.4% upPParasailfp8$0.24 in·$2.20 out·262k·99.9% upAAkashMLfp8$0.25 in·$2.20 out·262k·100% upIIonstreamfp8$0.28 in·$2.55 out·262k·97.9% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.40 in·$3.00 out·262k·99.5% upNNovita$0.42 in·$3.00 out·1M·99.9% upAlibaba Cloud$0.42 in·$2.55 out·1M·100% upCloudflare Workers AI$0.45 in·$3.20 out·262k·91.7% upVVenicefp8$0.45 in·$3.20 out·262k·97.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI while Qwen3.8 27B is developed by Qwen. Grok 4.7 has a 500K token context window vs Qwen3.8 27B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 27B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.8 27B is $1.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 27B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Grok 4.7 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoHy3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Qwen3.8 27B logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Qwen3.8 27B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5 Codex logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5 CodexNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5 Mini logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5 MiniNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5 Nano logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5 NanoNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5 Pro logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5 ProNew provider

Model pages

Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.8 27B57 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed