Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Grok 4vsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Updated Jul 2025

Grok 4vsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than Grok 4 at $0.2/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Grok 4 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input price$3/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$0.8/M tokens
Context window256K tokens131K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2025
Our Verdict
Grok 4
Grok 4
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4 has the edge: bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 19x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Grok 4
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
15× cheaper
Output
$0.80
19× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both: 15× input, 19× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

Grok 4

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25074 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLake$0.05 in·$0.19 out·128k·98.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·97.7% upNNebiusfp8$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·95% upAlibaba Cloud$0.13 in·$0.52 out·131k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
57%

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 2.7x more bold

Grok 4
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
56%Vocabulary55%
18wSentence Length19w
0.65Hedging0.46
2.4Bold6.4
2.4Lists3.9
0.60Emoji1.10
0.73Headings0.86
0.06Transitions0.14
Based on 26 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoMiniMax M3 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoClaude Sonnet 4 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
Grok 4 logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
Grok 4 vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-5.2 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-5.2New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-5.2 Chat logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-5.2 ChatNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-5.2 Pro logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-5.2 ProNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-5.3 Chat logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-5.3 ChatNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed