xAI: Grok 4 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare xAI: Grok 4 by xAI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 256K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
xAI: Grok 4
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 53x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
xAI: Grok 4
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
42× cheaper
Output
$0.28
53× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 42× input, 53× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 9.7x more emoji
xAI: Grok 4
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
53%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length14w
0.67Hedging0.12
2.7Bold7.5
2.7Lists4.2
0.07Emoji0.68
0.86Headings0.93
0.04Transitions0.12
Based on 21 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
