Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Hy3vsMiMo-V2.5-Pro
Updated Jul 2026

Hy3vsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

Hy3 is cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro at $0.132/M vs $1/M input tokens.

Hy3 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecHy3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input price$0.132/M tokens$1/M tokens
Output price$0.528/M tokens$3/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Hy3921 words
Premise: A functional solid-state transistor (germanium point-contact or junction) is demonstrated in 1920, with steady refinement through the interwar years. Vacuum tubes are not immediately displaced, but by the early 1930s transistors are reliable enough for niche military and telecom use, and by the late 1930s they…
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro3,115 words
The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual History Through 1980 This is one of the richest counterfactuals in technological history because the transistor wasn't just an incremental improvement—it was the foundational enabler of the entire digital age.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Hy3997 words
Assumptions / Starting Point Current time: Monday 9:00 AM. Board meeting: Wednesday 9:00 AM (Hour 48). Earnings call: Thursday 9:00 AM (Hour 72). Drug: $2B revenue, 4M patients, liver failure 1/8,000 over 5 yrs (~500 total, ~100/yr).
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro3,124 words
The Next 48 Hours: An Action Plan The Core Decision (Made in the First 30 Minutes) Before I lay out the hour-by-hour plan, let me be clear about the foundational decision: we disclose, we act, and we act now.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Hy3354 words
1) Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030, $m) Entry (end FY25): EBITDA $120m, EV = 12.0x = $1,440m. Fees 2% = $28.8m. Debt: TL $480m (9% cash, 1% amort), Mezz $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK). Equity = 1,440+28.8–660 = $808.8m. FY Revenue EBITDA TL Int Mezz Int Cash Tax* Capex ΔNWC FCF after req. svc (opt.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro760 words
HarborTech Services — LBO Underwrite Sources & Uses $m Uses Enterprise Value (12.0× $120m) 1,440.0 Transaction Fees (2.0%) 28.8 Total Uses 1,468.8 Sources Term Loan (4.0× EBITDA) 480.0 Mezzanine (1.5× EBITDA) 180.0 Total Debt 660.0 44.9% Sponsor Equity 808.8 55.1% Year-by-Year Operating Model (FY2026–FY2030) All…
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Hy3498 words
The 90-Day Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: Maximize healthspan, cognitive resilience, and physical capacity via quantified self, metabolic flexibility, and targeted compounds. Assumptions: Healthy adult, experienced with fasting/exercise, access to wearables & supplements. I.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro1,741 words
🧬 The 3-Month Longevity Optimization Protocol A Comprehensive Biohacker's Blueprint Disclaimer: This plan is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Hy3178 words
Dish Name: Ruby Hurricane Pasta Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): Spaghetti (or any dry pasta) Canned diced tomatoes Garlic (pre-minced or whole cloves) Extra-virgin olive oil Red pepper flakes Salt Grated Parmesan (shelf-stable style) (Water for boiling pasta is assumed free and not counted.)
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro203 words
Dish Name: Pantry Raid Pasta Estimated Time: 10 min prep / 15 min cook Ingredients 250g spaghetti (or any pasta) 3 cloves garlic, thinly sliced 3 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp crushed red pepper flakes 1 tsp smoked paprika 1/2 cup grated Parmesan cheese (or any hard cheese) Salt & black pepper to taste Instructions Cook the…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Hy3559 words
Below are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, why they fail under scrutiny, and how to fix them with concrete, defensible improvements. Slide 3 – “94% accuracy” and “works with any language, any device” Why it’s weak: Technical implausibility: State-of-the-art non-invasive EEG decoding for…
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro715 words
Based on a critical analysis of the pitch deck, here are the three weakest claims, along with explanations and suggestions for strengthening them. Weakest Claim: "94% accuracy" (Slide 3) Why it's weak: This is a classic "lab vs. real world" problem.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Hy3
Hy3
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Hy3 costs 5.7x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Hy3
Input
$0.13
7.6× cheaper
Output
$0.53
5.7× cheaper
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$3.00

Hy3 is cheaper on both: 7.6× input, 5.7× output.

Where to run it

13 hosts, cheapest first

Hy36 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.5% upTencentfp8$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.8% upNNovita$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·99.7% upPPhala$0.15 in·$0.64 out·262k·99.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.20 in·$0.80 out·262k·99.9% upGGMI Cloudbf16degraded$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·99% up
MiMo-V2.5-Pro7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
AAtlasCloudfp8$0.43 in·$0.87 out·1M·94.5% upXiaomifp8$0.43 in·$0.87 out·1M·99.3% upDDigitalOcean$0.48 in·$1.80 out·262k·99.1% upGGMI Cloudbf16degraded$0.30 in·$0.61 out·1.1M·50% upDDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.39 in·$1.17 out·1M·90% upNNovitadegraded$0.48 in·$0.96 out·1M·94.6% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
SStreamLakedegraded$0.52 in·$1.04 out·1M·93.1% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Hy3 is developed by Tencent while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi. Hy3 has a 262K token context window vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Hy3 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Hy3 costs $0.132/M input tokens and MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $1/M input tokens. Hy3 is $0.87/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Hy3 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Hy3 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Hy3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2.5-Pro logoSolar Pro 4 logo
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Hy3 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2.5-Pro logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2.5-Pro logoGLM 5.3 logo
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Hy3 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Hy3 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2.5-Pro logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Hy3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Hy3 vs Hy4 PreviewSame lab
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
MiMo-V2.5-Pro logoMiMo-V2.6-Pro logo
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-ProSame lab
MiMo-V2.5-Pro logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash logo
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSame lab
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 4.8 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 4.8Same size
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 5 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 5Same size
Hy3 logoClaude Sonnet 4 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
Hy3 logoClaude Sonnet 4.6 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6New provider

Model pages

Hy3 logo
Hy314 outputs, specs and price
MiMo-V2.5-Pro logo
MiMo-V2.5-Pro57 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed