Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Hy4 PreviewvsMiniMax M2.5
Updated Aug 2026

Hy4 PreviewvsMiniMax M2.5

MiniMax M2.5 is cheaper than Hy4 Preview at $0.3/M vs $0.834/M input tokens.

Hy4 Preview and MiniMax M2.5 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecHy4 PreviewMiniMax M2.5
Input price$0.834/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$2.501/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens205K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Hy4 Preview624 words
MEMORANDUM To: Investment Committee From: Underwriting Team Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: Project Harbor – HarborTech Services (HTS) LBO Underwriting Transaction Overview & Sources & Uses (at Close, end of FY2025) Entry EBITDA: $120.0m Entry Multiple: 12.0x Enterprise Value (EV): $1,440.0m Transaction Fees (2% EV)…
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.5688 words
1. FY 2026 – FY 2030 cash‑flow build‑up ($ m) FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Revenue 972.0 1 040.0 1 102.4 1 157.6 1 215.4 EBITDA (‑% margin) 136.1 (14 %) 156.0 (15 %) 176.4 (16 %) 192.0 (16.5 %) 206.6 (17 %) Cash interest – TL (9 %) 43.2 41.0 37.6 32.8 26.8 Cash interest – Mezz (12 %) 21.6 22.0 22.5 22.9 23.4…
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

Hy4 Preview681 words
This is a classic variation of the "Ticking Time Bomb" thought experiment, often used in ethics to test the boundaries between deontological (rule-based) ethics and utilitarian (consequence-based) ethics. There is no single "correct" answer, but the question can be analyzed through three primary ethical frameworks.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.5320 words
This scenario presents a stark ethical dilemma between two fundamental values: respecting individual dignity and identity versus maximizing overall well-being. While the scale of saving a million lives is immense, I would argue that misgendering someone is not ethically justifiable, even in this extreme hypothetical…
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Hy4 Preview873 words
Here is a 3-minute stand-up routine focused on observational humor and the absurdity of modern social contracts. Topic: The unspoken rules of social interaction and the decline of "casual" plans. Tone: Conversational, slightly exasperated, energetic. (Walk up to mic, adjust height, take a breath.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.5669 words
[Intro – walking on stage, waving to the audience] Hey, everybody! How’re you doing tonight? Good? Awesome. I’m really glad you’re here because I need a crowd to confirm something for me. [Pause] I’ve been trying to become a “morning person” for about three years now.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Hy4 Preview1,253 words
This is a counterfactual scenario of massive proportions. The transistor is the fundamental building block of the modern world; moving its invention from Bell Labs in 1947 to 1920 (perhaps an accidental discovery during early radio research) grants humanity an extra 27 years of development during a period defined by…
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.51,206 words
This is a fascinating counterfactual that ripples across every dimension of modern history. Let’s construct a plausible timeline, assuming a functional transistor (or at least a solid-state amplifier) emerges in the early 1920s, based on theoretical work by Lilienfeld (1926) and others, but made practical a…
Read the full answer

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

Hy4 Preview924 words
By 2035, the film industry will likely have moved past the initial "shock and awe" phase of Generative AI and entered an era of synthetic realism. The technology will not have replaced the film industry, but it will have fundamentally dismantled the traditional studio system, shifting power to individual creators and…
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.51,411 words
What the film industry could look like by 2035 – a speculative roadmap Time‑frame Key AI‑driven developments How they reshape the industry 2025‑2027 – Early adoption • Generative script tools (large language models that can draft a first‑draft screenplay, suggest dialogue, and even propose plot twists).
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Hy4 Preview1,049 words
Setting: The Steve Jobs Theater at Apple Park. The lights are dim, focusing on two iconic Le Corbusier leather sofas. It is late 2025. Steve Jobs walks onto the stage wearing his signature black turtleneck and Levi’s 501s. He looks exactly as he did in 2011, holding a glass of water.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.5802 words
Note: The following is a fictional, simulated interview. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, so this dialogue is a creative exercise and not a real conversation. Interviewer (I): Good morning. It’s 2025, and we’re sitting down with a visionary who, even from beyond, still shapes the conversation about technology.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Hy4 Preview
Hy4 Preview
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax M2.5Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Hy4 Preview has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Hy4 Preview
Input
$0.83
Output
$2.50
MiniMax M2.5
Input
$0.30
2.8× cheaper
Output
$1.20
2.1× cheaper

MiniMax M2.5 is cheaper on both: 2.8× input, 2.1× output.

Where to run it

8 hosts, cheapest first

Hy4 Preview1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Tencentfp8$0.83 in·$2.50 out·1M·100% up
MiniMax M2.57 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
VVenice$0.27 in·$0.95 out·198k·92.3% upSStreamLake$0.27 in·$1.08 out·200k·99.6% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.29 in·$1.20 out·197k·99.6% upDDigitalOcean$0.30 in·$1.20 out·66k·99.9% upFFriendli$0.30 in·$1.20 out·197k·100% upMiniMaxfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·205k·99.9% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
NNovitafp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·205k·99.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
46%

Hy4 Preview uses 27.5x more emoji

Hy4 Preview
MiniMax M2.5
53%Vocabulary55%
16wSentence Length25w
0.43Hedging0.58
5.9Bold6.0
3.8Lists4.4
0.40Emoji0.01
0.67Headings1.11
0.13Transitions0.16
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Hy4 Preview logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Hy4 Preview vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.5 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Hy4 Preview logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Hy4 Preview vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.5 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Hy4 Preview logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Hy4 Preview vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.5 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Hy4 Preview logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Hy4 Preview vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.5 logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Hy4 Preview logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy4 Preview vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
Hy4 Preview logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Hy4 Preview vs GPT-6 AstraSame size
MiniMax M2.5 logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs MiniMax M2.7Version compare
MiniMax M2.5 logoMiniMax M3 logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs MiniMax M3Version compare
MiniMax M2.5 logoGemini 3.5 Flash logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashSame size
MiniMax M2.5 logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashSame size
MiniMax M2.5 logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame size
MiniMax M2.5 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
MiniMax M2.5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame size

Model pages

Hy4 Preview logo
Hy4 Preview58 outputs, specs and price
MiniMax M2.5 logo
MiniMax M2.553 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed