Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Kimi K2.7 CodevsQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Updated Sep 2026

Kimi K2.7 CodevsQwen3.8 Max (0902)

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) at $0.95/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price$0.95/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$4/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJun 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Kimi K2.7 Code596 words
30-Day Health & Longevity Starter Plan Core idea: Don’t overhaul everything at once. Build 3 small, repeatable habits in Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep/Stress Recovery. Aim for “better most days,” not perfect. Nutrition: Eat Mostly Whole Foods, Protein & Plants This week: Add before you subtract.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)536 words
The 30-Day Foundation Plan Core principle: Don't overhaul your life. Layer small wins that compound. 🏃 Area 1: Movement The goal isn't fitness. It's making your body a place you want to live in. Week 1 — Build the trigger Walk 15 minutes daily (same time each day to build the habit) No gym. No gear.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Kimi K2.7 Code218 words
Sunshine Chickpea & Rice Pilaf A cozy, one-pot pantry meal that’s earthy, lightly spiced, and satisfying. Ingredients (7 pantry staples) 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 can (14.5 oz) diced tomatoes, with juices 1 cup long-grain white rice 1 small yellow onion, diced 2 cloves garlic, minced 2 tbsp olive…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)230 words
🍯 Midnight Crispy Chickpea Bowl A sweet-savory, crispy rice bowl that comes together faster than delivery. Ingredients (7) # Ingredient Amount 1 Canned chickpeas (drained & patted dry) 1 can (15 oz) 2 Soy sauce 3 tbsp 3 Honey 2 tbsp 4 Garlic (minced) 3 cloves 5 Vegetable oil 2 tbsp 6 Instant or leftover cooked rice 2…
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Kimi K2.7 Code880 words
For the experienced software engineer You can think of a large language model as a distributed compression engine that has been forced to become a pattern-matching oracle. During training, it is shown trillions of tokens of text and is optimized for one task: predict the next token given all previous tokens.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1,046 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a lossy compression function trained on a massive corpus. During training, you're essentially building a statistical model of "given this sequence of tokens, what's the probability distribution over the next token?"
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Kimi K2.7 Code511 words
Below is a structured review of the proposed architecture. Issues are grouped by domain, and each includes a problem, impact, and a specific solution with trade-offs.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)477 words
Architecture Failure Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Editor Critical Issues (Data Loss / Correctness) Last-Write-Wins with Client Clocks — Fundamental Data Loss Problem: Client clocks are unreliable. They drift, can be manually set, and differ across timezones.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Kimi K2.7 Code817 words
The three weakest claims are the technical “read your mind before you think it” vision, the “94% accuracy, any language, any device” solution claim, and the $180B top-down TAM.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)582 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch The TAM Claim: "$180B" (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is a textbook case of TAM inflation that immediately undermines credibility with any experienced investor.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Kimi K2.7 Code
Input
$0.95
2.1× cheaper
Output
$4.00
1.5× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper on both: 2.1× input, 1.5× output.

Where to run it

15 hosts, cheapest first

Kimi K2.7 Code14 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.68 in·$3.40 out·262k—IInceptronint4$0.71 in·$3.30 out·262k·99.8% upCCoreWeaveint4$0.71 in·$3.50 out·262k·99.9% upSStreamLake$0.71 in·$3.00 out·256k·99.7% upVVeniceint4$0.75 in·$3.50 out·256k·97.5% upMModelRunfp4$0.85 in·$3.75 out·262k·100% up
8 more hostsFewer hosts
SSiliconFlowfp8$0.86 in·$3.80 out·262k·99.8% upNNovitaint4$0.91 in·$3.84 out·262k·100% upAlibaba Cloudfp8$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·100% upBBasetenfp4$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·99.9% upCloudflare Workers AI$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·99.3% upFFireworks$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·96.2% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·100% upMoonshot AIint4$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·100% up
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Kimi K2.7 Code is developed by Moonshot AI while Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is developed by Qwen. Kimi K2.7 Code has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2/M input tokens. Kimi K2.7 Code is $1.05/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Kimi K2.7 Code logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Kimi K2.7 Code logoHy3 logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K2.7 Code logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K2.7 Code logoGLM 5.3 logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Kimi K2.7 Code logoKimi K3 logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K3Same lab
Kimi K2.7 Code logoKimi K2.5 logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2.5Same lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Kimi K2.7 Code logoGPT-1 logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-1New provider
Kimi K2.7 Code logoOptimus Alpha logo
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Optimus AlphaNew provider
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoOwl Alpha logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Owl AlphaSame size
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Ox AlphaSame size

Model pages

Kimi K2.7 Code logo
Kimi K2.7 Code58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)10 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed