Kimi K2vsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Kimi K2 at $0.071/M vs $0.57/M input tokens.
| Spec | Kimi K2 | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.57/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.3/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
Kimi K2
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 8.1x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Kimi K2
Input
$0.57
Output
$2.30
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
8.0× cheaper
Output
$0.28
8.1× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 8.0× input, 8.1× output.
Where to run it
2 hosts
Kimi K21 host
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
44%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 2.1x more bold
Kimi K2
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
66%Vocabulary52%
19wSentence Length15w
0.34Hedging0.20
3.3Bold7.0
3.4Lists4.2
0.54Emoji0.89
0.48Headings0.91
0.05Transitions0.10
Based on 28 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
