Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Kimi K3vsSolar Mini 4
Updated Sep 2026

Kimi K3vsSolar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper than Kimi K3 at $0.05/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Kimi K3 and Solar Mini 4 compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecKimi K3Solar Mini 4
Input price$3/M tokens$0.05/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens524K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Kimi K31,229 words
FIRST FROST Langoustine · Frost-Sweetened Parsnip · Coffee · Vanilla · Horseradish Snow The Narrative This dish is built on a piece of winter biochemistry. When the first frost strikes, parsnips and horseradish defend themselves by converting starch into sugar — a natural antifreeze — which is why country cooks have…
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,364 words
Chronos & Tides A Three-Component Study in Preservation, Precision, and Ephemeral Sensation Concept: A single plate that traces the lifecycle of an umami-rich flavor profile through three distinct temporal states: fermented (time in), precision-cooked (time controlled), and volatile (time suspended).
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Kimi K3669 words
HarborTech Services LBO — IC Underwriting Conventions: interest on beginning-of-year balances; mandatory TL amort = 1% of original principal ($4.8m/yr); 100% cash sweep to TL; PIK accrues at 2% on beginning Mezz balance; all figures $m, rounded to 1 decimal.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,718 words
518.51935 New TL: 276.34682 - 86.82747 = 189.51935 Mezz: PIK 194.8377888 * 0.02 = 3.896755776 New Mezz: 194.8377888 + 3.896755776 = 198.734544576 Ending Balances: TL: 189.52 Mezz: 198.73 Total Debt: 388.25 Exit (End of FY2030): Exit EBITDA: 206.6252668 Exit Multiple: 10.5x Exit EV: 206.6252668 * 10.5 = 2,169.5653014…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Kimi K31,904 words
Contract Risk Analysis: Contractor Perspective Overall assessment: Every substantive clause in this agreement is one-sided in the Client's favor. Several are likely unenforceable as written, but enforceability only matters after expensive litigation — the practical risk is that these clauses give the Client leverage to…
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,994 words
This agreement contains several provisions that are heavily one-sided, overly broad, or legally vulnerable. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the most exploitable terms, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them. Note: Contract law varies significantly by jurisdiction.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Kimi K31,542 words
Architecture Review: Collaborative Document Editor Overall assessment: The load-bearing problem is the sync layer — client-clock LWW + 2-second cross-server polling guarantees data loss and divergence under normal use.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,165 words
Here’s a systematic breakdown of the architectural weaknesses, failure modes, and scaling bottlenecks in your design, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs. Real-Time Synchronization & WebSocket Affinity Issue: Round-robin load balancing is stateless, but WebSockets are stateful and long-lived.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Kimi K31,479 words
The Software Engineer An LLM is, mechanically, just a function: a giant composition of matrix multiplications and nonlinearities that maps a sequence of tokens (chunks of text, roughly ¾ of a word each) to a probability distribution over what token comes next.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 4893 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer From a systems architecture perspective, the skepticism that "predicting the next word" yields intelligence is understandable, but it stems from viewing the model through a deterministic, code-based lens rather than a probabilistic, distributed-systems lens.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Kimi K31,055 words
IC MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) Price $46 Mkt cap $8.74B Net cash $1.4B EV $7.34B EV/FY25 Rev 9.0x EV/FY26E Rev 7.4x EV/FY26E EBIT 37x Recommendation: SHORT (moderate conviction; 1.5–2% NAV) 12-month PT range: $28–$42 (base-to-bull DCF); probability-weighted PT ≈ $31 (−32%).
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 4347 words
Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) To: Investment Committee From: Research Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: Long/Short Recommendation: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation Action: Long 12-Month PT Range: $55 – $65 Thesis: LedgerLift demonstrates best-in-class SaaS metrics (123% NRR, 94% gross retention) within a…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Kimi K3
Kimi K3
Solar Mini 4
Solar Mini 4Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi K3 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Solar Mini 4 costs 75x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Kimi K3
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Solar Mini 4
Input
$0.05
60× cheaper
Output
$0.20
75× cheaper

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper on both: 60× input, 75× output.

Where to run it

18 hosts, cheapest first

Kimi K317 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SSail Researchfp4$0.88 in·$10.53 out·1M·99.3% upIInferenceNetfp4$1.30 in·$11.40 out·1M·99.8% upWWafer$1.99 in·$15.00 out·1M·98.8% upMMakora$2.04 in·$12.75 out·1M·98.1% upPPhala$2.10 in·$10.50 out·1M·99% upRRelacefp4$2.10 in·$10.50 out·1M·98.1% up
11 more hostsFewer hosts
MMorph$2.50 in·$14.00 out·1M·99.6% upDDigitalOcean$2.55 in·$12.95 out·1M·98.7% upDDeepInfrabf16$2.85 in·$14.25 out·1M·96.6% upBBasetenfp8$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·98.8% upCChutesmxfp4$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·95.9% upFFireworks$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·99.9% upModalmxfp4$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·99.8% upMoonshot AImxfp4$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·99.9% upPParasailfp4$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·98.9% upTTogether$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·99.2% upAlibaba Cloud$3.45 in·$17.25 out·1M·99.3% up
Solar Mini 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.05 in·$0.20 out·524k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI while Solar Mini 4 is developed by Upstage. Kimi K3 has a 1.0M token context window vs Solar Mini 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Kimi K3 and Solar Mini 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Kimi K3 costs $3/M input tokens and Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05/M input tokens. Solar Mini 4 is $2.95/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Kimi K3 and Solar Mini 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Kimi K3 logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K3 logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoCommand A+ logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Kimi K3 logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Kimi K3 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Kimi K3 logoKimi K2.7 Code logo
Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeSame lab
Kimi K3 logoKimi K2 logo
Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2Same lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 4Same lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Kimi K3 logoLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Kimi K3 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)New provider
Solar Mini 4 logoLing 3.0 Flash VL (free) logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)New provider
Solar Mini 4 logoLlama 3 70B logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Llama 3 70BNew provider
Solar Mini 4 logoLlama 3.1 405B logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Llama 3.1 405BNew provider

Model pages

Kimi K3 logo
Kimi K358 outputs, specs and price
Solar Mini 4 logo
Solar Mini 419 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed