Kimi Linear 48B A3B InstructvsQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper than Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) at $0.3/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
| Spec | Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct | Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.6/M tokens | $4/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct costs 6.7x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.30
1.3× cheaper
Output
$0.60
6.7× cheaper
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 1.3× input, 6.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 34.0x more emoji
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
63%Vocabulary54%
15wSentence Length15w
0.19Hedging0.36
5.2Bold7.0
3.2Lists4.6
0.00Emoji0.34
0.38Headings0.94
0.05Transitions0.09
Based on 14 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6New provider
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Claude Sonnet 5New provider
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs OpenAI Codex MiniNew provider
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Cypher Alpha (free)New provider