Kimi Linear 48B A3B InstructvsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is cheaper than Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct at $0.15/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.
| Spec | Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.6/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 66K tokens |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.30
Output
$0.60
2.5× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.15
2.0× cheaper
Output
$1.50
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins input (2.0× cheaper)·Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct wins output (2.5× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
65%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct uses 58.9x more emoji
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
63%Vocabulary52%
15wSentence Length16w
0.19Hedging0.20
5.2Bold5.8
3.2Lists3.7
0.00Emoji0.59
0.38Headings0.96
0.05Transitions0.05
Based on 14 + 20 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.5New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.6New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.7New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.8New provider