Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Laguna XS 2.1 (free)vsLFM2.5-2.6B
Updated Aug 2026

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)vsLFM2.5-2.6B

Laguna XS 2.1 (free) has a larger context window than LFM2.5-2.6B (262K tokens vs 128K tokens).

Laguna XS 2.1 (free) and LFM2.5-2.6B compared across 11 shared prompts
SpecLaguna XS 2.1 (free)LFM2.5-2.6B
Input priceFreeFree
Output priceFreeFree
Context window262K tokens128K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)Yes (1 provider)
ReleasedJul 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 11 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)870 words
The Transistor Revolution: A 1920 Timeline Analysis Immediate Impact (1920-1940) Early Military Applications With transistors available 27 years before radar, telecommunications would see revolutionary improvements: Radio warfare: Nations could develop sophisticated radio direction-finding and jamming capabilities by…
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B1,248 words
The invention of the transistor in 1920, rather than 1947, fundamentally rewires the trajectory of the 20th century. The pivotal difference is not the year of invention, but the 23 years of head start provided for the semiconductor industry, the physics of solid-state electronics, and the subsequent digital revolution.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)602 words
Recipe: "Nocturne of Shadows and Light" Concept: A poetic exploration of ancient flavors (pomegranate, quince) intertwined with modernist techniques (spherification, sous vide) and an unexpected coffee-cocoa depth, harmonizing the boldness of game with the elegance of fruit.
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B992 words
Dish Name: Echoes of the Abyss Concept: A deconstructed narrative of the ocean meeting the earth. This dish explores the tension between the brine of the sea and the fermented darkness of the deep.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)635 words
I'll analyze each clause in this software consulting agreement to identify potential risks to the contractor and suggest modifications with legal reasoning. Clause-by-Clause Analysis Clause 1: SCOPE Risk: Unlimited scope creep without additional compensation Modification: Add: "Any modification to the scope requiring…
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B2,109 words
Contract Analysis: Risks and Recommended Modifications Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the Software Consulting Agreement, identifying potential exposure for the Contractor and suggesting specific modifications. SCOPE Clause Text: "Contractor shall provide software development services as directed by Client.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)877 words
INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long/Short/Comps Analysis Date: [Insert Date] Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $85–$105 Thesis: LedgerLift is executing on a best-in-class B2B SaaS spend management platform with high net revenue retention (NRR), strong gross margins, and a rapidly…
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B510 words
INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO To: Investment Committee From: Equity Research Desk Date: October 26, 2024 Subject: LLLT (LedgerLift) Investment Thesis & Valuation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target: $52.00 – $55.00 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-margin, sticky B2B SaaS company…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)409 words
1-Month Health & Longevity Plan Focus Areas: Diet, Exercise, Sleep Week 1: Start with Foundational Habits Diet: Action: Add 1 serving of fruit or vegetables daily (e.g., a banana with breakfast, a side salad with lunch). Why: Boosts nutrient intake and fiber.
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B497 words
Month 1: Simple Action Plan for Better Health and Longevity Goal: Build three sustainable habits that form the foundation of a longer, healthier life. Focus on diet, exercise, and sleep, with small, daily actions that compound over time. 1.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)610 words
For the Software Engineer Think of training a language model like building a distributed prediction system with an incredibly complex API contract. Instead of training on labeled datasets where you explicitly tell it "this text is sentiment-positive," you're feeding it massive amounts of text and asking it to predict…
Read the full answer
LFM2.5-2.6B798 words
For the Software Engineer At its core, a large language model is a massive neural network—a function approximator trained via gradient descent on a colossal corpus of text.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)
LFM2.5-2.6B
LFM2.5-2.6BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Laguna XS 2.1 (free) has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
LFM2.5-2.6B
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

2 hosts

Laguna XS 2.1 (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
PPoolsidefp8$0 in·$0 out·262k·99.8% up
LFM2.5-2.6B1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Liquid AIfp8$0 in·$0 out·66k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Laguna XS 2.1 (free) is developed by Poolside while LFM2.5-2.6B is developed by Liquid AI. Laguna XS 2.1 (free) has a 262K token context window vs LFM2.5-2.6B's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 11 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Laguna XS 2.1 (free) and LFM2.5-2.6B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 11 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Laguna XS 2.1 (free) costs $0/M input tokens and LFM2.5-2.6B costs $0/M input tokens. LFM2.5-2.6B is $0.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Laguna XS 2.1 (free) and LFM2.5-2.6B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoHy3 logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
LFM2.5-2.6B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoLaguna S 2.1 (free) logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Laguna S 2.1 (free)Same lab
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Granite 4.2 8BSame size
LFM2.5-2.6B logoNorth Mini Code logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs North Mini CodeSame size
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNew provider
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGemini 3.5 Flash logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 3.5 FlashNew provider
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 3.6 FlashNew provider
LFM2.5-2.6B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashNew provider

Model pages

Laguna XS 2.1 (free) logo
Laguna XS 2.1 (free)11 outputs, specs and price
LFM2.5-2.6B logo
LFM2.5-2.6B56 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed