Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)vsQwen3.5 122B A10B
Updated Aug 2026

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)vsQwen3.5 122B A10B

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is cheaper than Qwen3.5 122B A10B at $0/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input priceFree$0.4/M tokens
Output priceFree$3.2/M tokens
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedAug 2026Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 20 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,253 words
L'Archipel des Ombres (The Archipelago of Shadows) Michelin-Caliber Multi-Component Dish 7 Components Conceptual Narrative: Memory, Mineral Essence, and the Meeting of Land and Sea CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE This dish is an edible cartography—a map of an imaginary archipelago where volcanic soil meets oceanic tides.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,067 words
Dish Title: Nocturne in Blue: Aged Otoro & Cascara Earth Conceptual Narrative "Nocturne in Blue" is a meditation on the boundary between the deep ocean and the dark earth. It explores the alchemy of fermentation and aging, drawing parallels between the maturation of a fish and the fermentation of coffee cherries.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,066 words
The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual Analysis Through 1980 I. Premise and Plausibility For a transistor to emerge in 1920, we must assume that either the theoretical framework of semiconductor physics was accelerated (quantum mechanics was only being formulated in the mid-1920s), or that empirical discovery—building…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,264 words
This scenario requires a fundamental shift in the history of physics and materials science. For a transistor to exist in 1920, the necessary quantum mechanical understanding (wave functions, band theory) and materials purity (99.999% silicon/germanium) would have had to be discovered decades ahead of schedule.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)928 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Here's the thing: the way you build a distributed system that "does the right thing" isn't by writing rules for every possible scenario — it's by designing the system so that correct behavior emerges from many simple, well-specified interactions.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B727 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of the training process not as "learning" in a human sense, but as a massive distributed data engineering pipeline. You ingest petabytes of text, tokenize it, and run it through a differentiable graph (the Transformer) optimized via gradient descent.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,560 words
Comprehensive Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor CRITICAL: WebSocket Broadcasting Is Siloed Per-Server Problem: Each server maintains its own WebSocket connections. When User A (on Server 1) types, the change is only broadcast to clients connected to Server 1.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,172 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that will lead to data loss, poor user experience, and system instability at scale. The "Last-write-wins" strategy combined with client-side timestamps is particularly dangerous for collaborative editing.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)961 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch 🚨 The $180B TAM Claim (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is the most logically incoherent claim in the entire deck. The pitch states the BCI market is projected to reach $5.3B by 2030 (citing Grand View Research) — and then immediately claims a TAM of $180B.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B760 words
Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, analyzed for scientific feasibility, technical credibility, and strategic alignment. The "Precognition" Claim (Slide 1 - Vision) The Claim: "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it."
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)166 words
Midnight Molten Lava Cake Ingredients: All-purpose flour (4 tbsp) Granulated sugar (4 tbsp) Unsweetened cocoa powder (2 tbsp) Vegetable oil (3 tbsp) Water (2 tbsp) Vanilla extract (¼ tsp) Baking powder (¼ tsp) Instructions: Combine Dry Ingredients: In a standard microwave-safe mug, whisk together the flour, sugar…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B251 words
Rustic Sunset Penne A warm, comforting pasta dish that feels gourmet but relies entirely on shelf-stable staples. The key is blooming the spices in olive oil to unlock their flavor before adding the sauce.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input
$0.40
Output
$3.20
Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up
Qwen3.5 122B A10B5 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·96.8% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.29 in·$2.40 out·262k·99.7% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·98.7% upNNovitabf16$0.40 in·$3.20 out·262k·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8degraded$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·86.7% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is developed by inclusionAI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) costs $0/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoHy3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash VL (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)Same lab
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.5 27B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.5 27BVersion compare
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17 logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025Same size
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20New provider

Model pages

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)20 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B53 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed