Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) has a larger context window than Riverflow V2 Fast (262K tokens vs 8K tokens).
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | — |
| Output price | Free | — |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 8K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | not listed |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 29 Sep 2026.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is developed by inclusionAI while Riverflow V2 Fast is developed by Sourceful. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) has a 262K token context window vs Riverflow V2 Fast's 8K. You can compare their actual outputs across 2 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) and Riverflow V2 Fast each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 2 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) and Riverflow V2 Fast across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.