Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Updated Sep 2026

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at $0/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input priceFree$0.15/M tokens
Output priceFree$1.5/M tokens
Context window262K tokens66K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedSep 2026Sep 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)349 words
HarborTech Services – 5-Year LBO Underwriting Entry Summary Item Value FY2025 Revenue / EBITDA $900m / $120m Purchase EV (12.0x) $1,440m Transaction fees (2%) $28.8m → equity Term Loan (4.0x) $480m @ 9% cash, 1% amort Mezzanine (1.5x) $180m @ 12% cash + 2% PIK Equity invested $808.8m Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–FY2030)…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking405 words
Simplified Year-by-Year Cash Flow Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term + Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Required Payments Term Loan Balance Mezz Balance 2026 $972.0M $136.1M $64.8M $17.8M $29.2M $0.4M $19.1M $456.1M $183.6M 2027 $1,040.0M $156.0M $63.1M $23.2M $31.2M $0.3M $33.4M $417.9M…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)240 words
Here’s a low-pressure, 4-week blueprint. Pick one area to start (Week 1), then stack the next. Consistency beats intensity. Sleep (The Longevity Foundation) Week 1: Set a fixed wake time (±30 min, even weekends). Week 2: No caffeine after 2 pm; stop screens 30 min before bed.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking221 words
Here’s a simple, science-backed 1-month plan focused on 3 foundational pillars for longevity (diet, sleep, stress management). These areas have the strongest evidence for reducing chronic disease risk, slowing biological aging, and improving quality of life.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)489 words
Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Editor 🔴 Critical Issues Cross-Server Communication Gap (Race Condition) Problem: Server A broadcasts to its WebSocket clients, but Server B's clients only learn of changes via 2-second PostgreSQL polling.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking1,684 words
Here'sa comprehensive analysis of the architecture, identifying critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. For each issue, I've provided a specific solution with clear trade-offs based on real-world distributed systems best practices. 1.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)650 words
1. For the Software Engineer Think of it less as "AI" and more as a distributed autocomplete system operating in a 100-billion-dimensional key-value store. During training, the model isn't "understanding" text—it's adjusting millions of matrices to minimize the surprise of predicting the next token, similar to how…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking821 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer You're right to be skeptical—on the surface, "predicting the next word" sounds trivial, like a glorified autocomplete. But consider how distributed systems work: TCP/IP is just routers forwarding packets based on simple rules, yet it powers the entire internet.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)408 words
Here are the 3 weakest claims, ranked by how much they undermine credibility: Slide 3: "94% accuracy" Why it’s weak: This is a vanity metric without context. In brain-computer interfaces, accuracy is meaningless without specifying vocabulary size, latency, user calibration time, and false-positive rates.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking738 words
Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, analyzed with specific evidence and actionable improvements: Weakest Claim #1: "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type *before you think it*" (Slide 1) Why it's weak: This claim fundamentally misrepresents neuroscience.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)840 words
Disclaimer: This is informational analysis, not legal advice. Enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction (e.g., California voids non-competes; some states limit liability caps). Have an employment/contract attorney review before signing.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking1,491 words
Here'sa detailed analysis of exploitable clauses in this contract, with specific modifications and legal reasoning for each. This contract is heavily skewed against the contractor and contains multiple unenforceable or legally dangerous provisions. Below is a clause-by-clause breakdown: 1.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
Output
$1.50
Where to run it

3 hosts

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.15 in·$1.20 out·131k·99.3% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.15 in·$1.20 out·262k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is developed by inclusionAI while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) costs $0/M input tokens and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoHy3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash VL (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)Same lab
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoGPT-3.5 Turbo logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs GPT-3.5 TurboNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoGPT-4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs GPT-4New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoGPT-4.1 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs GPT-4.1New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoGPT-4.1 Mini logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs GPT-4.1 MiniNew provider

Model pages

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)19 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed