Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)vsQwen3.5 122B A10B
Updated Sep 2026

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)vsQwen3.5 122B A10B

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is cheaper than Qwen3.5 122B A10B at $0/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input priceFree$0.4/M tokens
Output priceFree$3.2/M tokens
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedSep 2026Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)437 words
LedgerLift (LLLT) – IC Memo Confidential – For Internal Use Only 1) Recommendation & Thesis Pass (bias cautious). 12-month PT: $32–$48. Thesis: LLLT has defensible mid-market AP lock-in and solid NRR, but at $46 the stock trades above DCF-implied value ($28 base) and only just clears comps on revenue multiples; we need…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B680 words
TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Team DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLL T) – Investment Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target: $52 – $58 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality mid-market SaaS compounder trading at FY25 median peer multiples despite…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)240 words
Here’s a low-pressure, 4-week blueprint. Pick one area to start (Week 1), then stack the next. Consistency beats intensity. Sleep (The Longevity Foundation) Week 1: Set a fixed wake time (±30 min, even weekends). Week 2: No caffeine after 2 pm; stop screens 30 min before bed.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B693 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed to build sustainable habits for longevity. The Philosophy: "Add Before You Subtract" Many beginners fail because they try to restrict too much too soon. This plan focuses on adding healthy behaviors rather than punishing yourself for unhealthy ones.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)445 words
48-Hour Action Plan: Patient Safety First Critical Reality Check First Your legal team's "6 months" likely refers to a full label revision, not initial safety signal reporting. FDA requires serious unexpected adverse events reported within 15 days (7 days if fatal).
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,255 words
Executive Decision: Immediate Disclosure & Safety Alert The Decision: I will not wait for more data, nor will I delay disclosure for the earnings call. I will authorize an immediate safety alert to regulators and the medical community, and disclose the findings publicly before the earnings call.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)489 words
Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Editor 🔴 Critical Issues Cross-Server Communication Gap (Race Condition) Problem: Server A broadcasts to its WebSocket clients, but Server B's clients only learn of changes via 2-second PostgreSQL polling.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,172 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that will lead to data loss, poor user experience, and system instability at scale. The "Last-write-wins" strategy combined with client-side timestamps is particularly dangerous for collaborative editing.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)408 words
Here are the 3 weakest claims, ranked by how much they undermine credibility: Slide 3: "94% accuracy" Why it’s weak: This is a vanity metric without context. In brain-computer interfaces, accuracy is meaningless without specifying vocabulary size, latency, user calibration time, and false-positive rates.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B760 words
Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, analyzed for scientific feasibility, technical credibility, and strategic alignment. The "Precognition" Claim (Slide 1 - Vision) The Claim: "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it."
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)650 words
1. For the Software Engineer Think of it less as "AI" and more as a distributed autocomplete system operating in a 100-billion-dimensional key-value store. During training, the model isn't "understanding" text—it's adjusting millions of matrices to minimize the surprise of predicting the next token, similar to how…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B727 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of the training process not as "learning" in a human sense, but as a massive distributed data engineering pipeline. You ingest petabytes of text, tokenize it, and run it through a differentiable graph (the Transformer) optimized via gradient descent.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input
$0.40
Output
$3.20
Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up
Qwen3.5 122B A10B5 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.29 in·$2.40 out·262k·99.8% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·98.7% upNNovitabf16$0.40 in·$3.20 out·262k·100% upAlibaba Clouddegraded$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·97.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8degraded$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·89.7% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is developed by inclusionAI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) costs $0/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoHy3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash VL (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)Same lab
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.5 27B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.5 27BVersion compare
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoClaude Sonnet 5 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Claude Sonnet 5Same size
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoOpenAI Codex Mini logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs OpenAI Codex MiniNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoCypher Alpha (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Cypher Alpha (free)Same size
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoDeepSeek V3.1 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs DeepSeek V3.1New provider

Model pages

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)19 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B53 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed