Llama 3.1 405B vs Mistral Nemo

Compare Llama 3.1 405B by Meta AI against Mistral Nemo by Mistral AI, context windows of 128K vs 128K, tested across 3 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 405B or Mistral Nemo?

Llama 3.1 405B and Mistral Nemo are both competitive models. Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo. Context windows: 128K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Llama 3.1 405B and Mistral Nemo

Llama 3.1 405B is made by meta while Mistral Nemo is from mistral. Llama 3.1 405B has a 128K token context window compared to Mistral Nemo's 128K. On pricing, Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens vs $0.03/M for Mistral Nemo.

Our Verdict
Llama 3.1 405B
Llama 3.1 405B
Mistral Nemo
Mistral NemoRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 3.1 405B has the edge — bigger model tier, major provider backing.

Mistral Nemo is 44x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
FAQ

This comparison gets 800+ views/month. Your brand could be here.

Advertise