Compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Llama 4 Scout, both from Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 10.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 128K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is made by meta while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 2.4× input, 1.6× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Llama 4 Scout uses 30.0x more headings
Compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Llama 4 Scout, both from Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 10.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 128K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is made by meta while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 2.4× input, 1.6× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Llama 4 Scout uses 30.0x more headings