Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs MiMo-V2.5
Compare Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) by Meta AI against MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
MiMo-V2.5
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
Output
$0.79
2.5× cheaper
MiMo-V2.5
Input
$0.40
1.5× cheaper
Output
$2.00
MiMo-V2.5 wins input (1.5× cheaper)·Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) wins output (2.5× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
35%
MiMo-V2.5 uses 100.6x more emoji
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
MiMo-V2.5
51%Vocabulary57%
18wSentence Length17w
0.46Hedging0.64
3.4Bold5.9
5.6Lists2.8
0.00Emoji1.01
0.00Headings1.07
0.06Transitions0.07
Based on 15 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
