Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)vsQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Updated Sep 2026

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)vsQwen3.8 Max (0902)

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) at $0.59/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price$0.59/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$0.79/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window128K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2024Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)311 words
Here is a simple recipe for a delicious dish using only 7 common pantry ingredients: Dish Name: "Sunset Crunch Bites" Ingredients: 1 cup rolled oats 1/2 cup peanut butter 1/4 cup honey 1/4 cup chopped peanuts 1/2 teaspoon salt 1/4 teaspoon cinnamon 1/4 cup chocolate chips (semi-sweet) Instructions: Preheat your oven to…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)230 words
🍯 Midnight Crispy Chickpea Bowl A sweet-savory, crispy rice bowl that comes together faster than delivery. Ingredients (7) # Ingredient Amount 1 Canned chickpeas (drained & patted dry) 1 can (15 oz) 2 Soy sauce 3 tbsp 3 Honey 2 tbsp 4 Garlic (minced) 3 cloves 5 Vegetable oil 2 tbsp 6 Instant or leftover cooked rice 2…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)420 words
Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity, focusing on 3 key areas: diet, exercise, and sleep. Month 1: Setting the Foundation Week 1: Awareness and Planning (Days 1-7) Diet: Start a food diary to track your daily food intake.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)536 words
The 30-Day Foundation Plan Core principle: Don't overhaul your life. Layer small wins that compound. 🏃 Area 1: Movement The goal isn't fitness. It's making your body a place you want to live in. Week 1 — Build the trigger Walk 15 minutes daily (same time each day to build the habit) No gym. No gear.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)612 words
Potential Failure Modes: Single Point of Failure (SPOF) in Load Balancer: If the load balancer fails, all incoming traffic will be lost. Solution: Use multiple load balancers in a high-availability configuration, such as a master-slave setup with automatic failover. Trade-off: Additional complexity and cost.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)477 words
Architecture Failure Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Editor Critical Issues (Data Loss / Correctness) Last-Write-Wins with Client Clocks — Fundamental Data Loss Problem: Client clocks are unreliable. They drift, can be manually set, and differ across timezones.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)729 words
For the experienced software engineer: You're likely familiar with the concept of prediction in distributed systems, where a model predicts the likelihood of a certain event or outcome. Large language models like GPT or Claude take this concept to the next level by predicting the next word in a sequence of text.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1,046 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a lossy compression function trained on a massive corpus. During training, you're essentially building a statistical model of "given this sequence of tokens, what's the probability distribution over the next token?"
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)419 words
Based on the pitch deck, I've identified the three weakest claims and provided suggestions for improvement: Weak Claim 1: "94% accuracy" (Slide 3) This claim is weak because it lacks context and credibility.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)582 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch The TAM Claim: "$180B" (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is a textbook case of TAM inflation that immediately undermines credibility with any experienced investor.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs 7.6x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
3.4× cheaper
Output
$0.79
7.6× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper on both: 3.4× input, 7.6× output.

Where to run it

3 hosts

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$0.72 in·$0.72 out·131k·100% upDDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.40 in·$0.40 out·131k·97.2% up
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is developed by Meta AI while Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is developed by Qwen. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2/M input tokens. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is $1.41/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoHy3 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiniMax M2.7Same size
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMiniMax M3 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs MiniMax M3Same size
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoMistral Large logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Mistral LargeSame size
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoMistral Large 2 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Mistral Large 2Same size

Model pages

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)56 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)10 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed