Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)vsSolar Mini 4
Updated Sep 2026

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)vsSolar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) at $0.05/M vs $0.59/M input tokens.

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Solar Mini 4 compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Solar Mini 4
Input price$0.59/M tokens$0.05/M tokens
Output price$0.79/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Context window128K tokens524K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2024Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)336 words
Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF Ending Debt 2026 $972m $136m $36m ($32m TL, $4m Mezz) $2.8m $29m $4.9m $63m $1,050m ($720m TL, $330m Mezz) 2027 $1,038m $155m $37m ($33m TL, $4m Mezz) $6.3m $31m $5.2m $76m $974m ($654m TL, $320m Mezz) 2028 $1,103m $176m $38m…
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,718 words
518.51935 New TL: 276.34682 - 86.82747 = 189.51935 Mezz: PIK 194.8377888 * 0.02 = 3.896755776 New Mezz: 194.8377888 + 3.896755776 = 198.734544576 Ending Balances: TL: 189.52 Mezz: 198.73 Total Debt: 388.25 Exit (End of FY2030): Exit EBITDA: 206.6252668 Exit Multiple: 10.5x Exit EV: 206.6252668 * 10.5 = 2,169.5653014…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)653 words
Dish Name: "Aurora Australis" - A Harmonious Union of Smoked Eel, Saffron-Infused Sunchokes, and Frozen Finger Lime Pearls Conceptual Narrative: Inspired by the breathtaking display of the Southern Lights, "Aurora Australis" is a dish that embodies the ethereal beauty of the Antarctic night sky.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,364 words
Chronos & Tides A Three-Component Study in Preservation, Precision, and Ephemeral Sensation Concept: A single plate that traces the lifecycle of an umami-rich flavor profile through three distinct temporal states: fermented (time in), precision-cooked (time controlled), and volatile (time suspended).
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)612 words
Potential Failure Modes: Single Point of Failure (SPOF) in Load Balancer: If the load balancer fails, all incoming traffic will be lost. Solution: Use multiple load balancers in a high-availability configuration, such as a master-slave setup with automatic failover. Trade-off: Additional complexity and cost.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,165 words
Here’s a systematic breakdown of the architectural weaknesses, failure modes, and scaling bottlenecks in your design, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs. Real-Time Synchronization & WebSocket Affinity Issue: Round-robin load balancing is stateless, but WebSockets are stateful and long-lived.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)420 words
Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity, focusing on 3 key areas: diet, exercise, and sleep. Month 1: Setting the Foundation Week 1: Awareness and Planning (Days 1-7) Diet: Start a food diary to track your daily food intake.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 4669 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners. The focus is on consistency over intensity, meaning small, sustainable changes are better than drastic overhauls that are hard to maintain. The 3 Key Pillars Nutrition: Focus on adding good things rather than strictly restricting.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)574 words
Investment Committee Memo Recommendation: Long 12-month PT range: $60-$75 Thesis: LedgerLift's strong B2B spend management and AP automation SaaS platform, with a loyal customer base and efficient growth model, positions the company for sustained success, driven by increasing adoption of digital payment solutions and…
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 4347 words
Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) To: Investment Committee From: Research Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: Long/Short Recommendation: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation Action: Long 12-Month PT Range: $55 – $65 Thesis: LedgerLift demonstrates best-in-class SaaS metrics (123% NRR, 94% gross retention) within a…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)610 words
After reviewing the contract, I've identified several clauses that could be exploited against the contractor. Here are my findings, suggested modifications, and explanations: 1. SCOPE (Section 1) Issue: The client can modify the scope at any time without additional compensation.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,994 words
This agreement contains several provisions that are heavily one-sided, overly broad, or legally vulnerable. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the most exploitable terms, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them. Note: Contract law varies significantly by jurisdiction.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Solar Mini 4
Solar Mini 4

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Solar Mini 4 costs 4.0x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
Output
$0.79
Solar Mini 4
Input
$0.05
12× cheaper
Output
$0.20
4.0× cheaper

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper on both: 12× input, 4.0× output.

Where to run it

3 hosts, cheapest first

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp8$0.40 in·$0.40 out·131k·99.4% upAmazon Bedrock$0.72 in·$0.72 out·131k·100% up
Solar Mini 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.05 in·$0.20 out·524k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is developed by Meta AI while Solar Mini 4 is developed by Upstage. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) has a 128K token context window vs Solar Mini 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Solar Mini 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs $0.59/M input tokens and Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05/M input tokens. Solar Mini 4 is $0.54/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) and Solar Mini 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoCommand A+ logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 4Same lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Solar Mini 4 logoKimi K2 0905 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Kimi K2 0905New provider
Solar Mini 4 logoKimi K2 Thinking logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Kimi K2 ThinkingNew provider
Solar Mini 4 logoKimi K2.5 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Kimi K2.5New provider
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoKimi K2.6 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Kimi K2.6Same size

Model pages

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)56 outputs, specs and price
Solar Mini 4 logo
Solar Mini 419 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed