Claude Opus 4.1vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 at $0.15/M vs $15/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.1 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.1
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 50x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.1
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
100× cheaper
Output
$1.50
50× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both: 100× input, 50× output.
Where to run it
4 hosts
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
46%
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 4.0x more sentence length
Claude Opus 4.1
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
63%Vocabulary56%
64wSentence Length16w
0.72Hedging0.32
4.5Bold5.1
5.3Lists3.9
0.81Emoji0.92
1.42Headings0.75
0.16Transitions0.08
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)New provider