Llama 4 Scout
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4
Compare Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 10.0M vs 200K, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Claude Opus 4?
Llama 4 Scout and Claude Opus 4 are both competitive models. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 10000K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Llama 4 Scout and Claude Opus 4
Llama 4 Scout is made by meta while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. Llama 4 Scout has a 10000K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4
Llama 4 ScoutRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Llama 4 Scout is 150x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji
Llama 4 Scout
Claude Opus 4
43%Vocabulary64%
42wSentence Length62w
0.81Hedging0.52
4.1Bold4.4
7.3Lists9.1
0.00Emoji0.11
0.30Headings1.87
0.04Transitions0.27
Based on 10 + 16 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ