Llama 4 Scout vs OpenAI o3
Compare Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI against OpenAI o3 by OpenAI, in 14 community votes, openai o3 wins 73% of head-to-head duels, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or OpenAI o3?
OpenAI o3 is the better choice overall, winning 73% of 14 blind community votes on Rival. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $10/M for OpenAI o3. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Llama 4 Scout and OpenAI o3
Llama 4 Scout is made by meta while OpenAI o3 is from openai. On pricing, Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $10/M for OpenAI o3. In community voting, In 14 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 73% of head-to-head duels.
In 14 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 73% of head-to-head duels. OpenAI o3 leads in Web Design, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 14+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 40× input, 80× output
Pick OpenAI o3. In 14 blind votes, OpenAI o3 wins 73% of the time. That's not luck.
OpenAI o3 particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design. Llama 4 Scout is 80x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Llama 4 Scout uses 5.9x more bold
