What is the difference between Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta AI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. Llama 4 Scout has a 10.0M token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

It depends on your use case. Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Llama 4 Scout cost compared to Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.25/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Llama 4 Scout is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Feb 2026

Llama 4 ScoutvsQwen3.5 122B A10B

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than Qwen3.5 122B A10B at $0.25/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	Llama 4 Scout	Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price	$0.25/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Output price	$0.5/M tokens	$3.2/M tokens
Context window	10.0M tokens	262K tokens
Parameters	17B active (109B total)	122B (10B active)
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Apr 2025	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	54.6%	72.0%