Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Mercury 2.5vsMiMo-V2-Omni
Updated Sep 2026

Mercury 2.5vsMiMo-V2-Omni

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper than MiMo-V2-Omni at $0.04/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecMercury 2.5MiMo-V2-Omni
Input price$0.04/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$0.15/M tokens$2/M tokens
Context window260K tokens262K tokens
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Mar 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 20 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Mercury 2.5403 words
1. Simplified Year-by-Year LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Assumptions: Enterprise Value (EV): $120m × 12.0x = $1,440m Transaction Fees: $1,440m × 2.0% = $28.8m Total Debt at Close: $120m × 5.5x = $660m Term Loan: $120m × 4.0x = $480m Mezzanine: $120m × 1.5x = $180m Equity Required: $1,440m (EV) + $28.8m (Fees) − $660m…
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni559 words
1) Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–2030) Line Item FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972.0 $1,040.0 $1,102.5 $1,157.6 $1,215.5 EBITDA $136.1 $156.0 $176.4 $191.0 $206.6 EBITDA Margin 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 16.5% 17.0% Cash Interest - TL $43.2 $42.8 $42.3 $41.9 $41.5 Cash Interest - Mezz $16.2 $16.2 $16.2 $16.2 $16.2…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Mercury 2.5660 words
Inventing the transistor in 1920 would have fundamentally reshaped the 20th century, compressing the digital age by roughly two decades. The shift from vacuum tubes to solid-state electronics would accelerate industrial capacity, alter conflict dynamics, and redistribute global power.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni1,005 words
Excellent question. This is a profound counterfactual that would rewrite the 20th century. Let's trace the implications, keeping in mind that the transistor's invention wasn't just a new device—it was the key that unlocked the information age. An earlier start accelerates everything built upon it.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Mercury 2.5572 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of the model as a stateless microservice that has ingested the entire public internet as its training dataset. During the training phase, it performs a massive distributed optimization job, adjusting internal weights to minimize a loss function based on next-token prediction.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni951 words
Of course. Here are three tailored explanations of how large language models learn and generate text. For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of training a large language model not as teaching it rules, but as building an incredibly sophisticated, lossy compression algorithm for the entire public internet and a…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Mercury 2.5827 words
Dish Title: Chronos and Mycelium Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the intersection of time, decay, and rebirth. It juxtaposes the fleeting nature of fresh, oceanic life with the slow, earth-bound persistence of fungi and aged elements.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni815 words
"Moonlit Tidal Pool" A Meditation on the Sea at Night Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the liminal space where the ocean meets the shore under moonlight—capturing the briny depth of the sea, the mineral whisper of tidal rocks, and the ephemeral glow of bioluminescence.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Mercury 2.5735 words
To: Investment Committee From: Equity Research Date: September 22, 2026 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiation of Coverage Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target: $55 – $68 Thesis: LedgerLift offers a rare combination of high-quality SaaS unit economics (NRR 123%, CAC payback 18mo) and…
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni1,100 words
Internal Investment Committee Memo Ticker: LLLT Date: October 26, 2023 Prepared by: Portfolio Analyst Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $58 - $72 (Base Case: $64) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, profitable SaaS compounder in the mission-critical spend management category, evidenced by…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Mercury 2.5190 words
Pantry Pasta Primavera Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 15 minutes Servings: 2 Ingredients (7 Common Pantry Items) Pasta (spaghetti, penne, or fusilli) – 8 oz Canned crushed tomatoes – 1 can (14 oz) Olive oil – 3 tablespoons Garlic powder – 1 teaspoon Dried oregano – 1 teaspoon Parmesan cheese (grated) – ½ cup Salt and…
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni227 words
🍝 Sunset Pasta A quick, vibrant dish that tastes like a cozy evening on a summer porch. Time: Prep 10 min Cook 15 min Serves: 2 Ingredients (7 pantry staples) Spaghetti or any pasta (8 oz / 225g) Canned crushed tomatoes (1 can, 14 oz / 400g) Garlic (3 cloves, minced) Olive oil (2 tbsp) Salt (to taste) Black pepper (to…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Mercury 2.5
Mercury 2.5
MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Mercury 2.5 costs 13x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Mercury 2.5
Input
$0.04
10× cheaper
Output
$0.15
13× cheaper
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input
$0.40
Output
$2.00

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper on both: 10× input, 13× output.

Where to run it

1 host

Mercury 2.51 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Inception$0.04 in·$0.15 out·260k·100% up
MiMo-V2-Omni

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Mercury 2.5 is developed by Inception while MiMo-V2-Omni is developed by Xiaomi. Mercury 2.5 has a 260K token context window vs MiMo-V2-Omni's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Mercury 2.5 costs $0.04/M input tokens and MiMo-V2-Omni costs $0.4/M input tokens. Mercury 2.5 is $0.36/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Mercury 2.5 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Mercury 2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoSolar Pro 4 logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 logoHy3 logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Mercury 2.5 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Mercury 2.5 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewSame lab
Mercury 2.5 logoMercury logo
Mercury 2.5 vs MercurySame lab
MiMo-V2-Omni logoMiMo-V2.6-Pro logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2.6-ProSame lab
MiMo-V2-Omni logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSame lab
Mercury 2.5 logoClaude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetSame size
Mercury 2.5 logoClaude Sonnet 4.5 logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Same size
Mercury 2.5 logoClaude Fable 5 logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Claude Fable 5New provider
Mercury 2.5 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1New provider

Model pages

Mercury 2.5 logo
Mercury 2.520 outputs, specs and price
MiMo-V2-Omni logo
MiMo-V2-Omni53 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed